The alternative headline of this article should read:

I really wish I could with this article and I applaud women who are happy not being married. No, ladies, you don't need a man to be happy. I'm often at my most happy and most free when I'm not in a relationship. This btw, is not the same as not being married. I wonder how many women understand the difference, because…

They won't respond at all. It has already been two hours, and nobody's come up yet... it won't happen.

You should not have brought ideologies into this. Now they (feminist bigots), will ignore the excellent points you made and focus on liberalism, socialism and anything else to avoid replying to you on point.

You can choose to do something willingly and still be exploited. You can agree to do something, and the person with whom you made that agreement can still take advantage of you.

I think one of the points I made above is that ideologies can be extremely mutable, particularly when they interfere with our pleasure. That's where terms like oppressor class are particularly useful. You can do anything you like to the oppressor class. It is not possible to sin against members of the oppressor class.…

Jezebel is passionate in its opposition to exploitation of women. Quite recently in an article about encouraging men to wear shorter shorts, a woman bragged that she'd secretly taken a photo of a man's legs because they turned her on. She wanted to post this photo on Jezebel, but couldn't figure out how to do it. She…

I agree 100%; that's why I posted this in the first place. This is a place that is particularly passionate in their (I'm generalizing) arguments against exploitation. So to see them tacitly endorse exploitation that is similar in scope to the kind they condemn, I feel the need to point it out every single time.

It's only exploitation if the person watching it doesn't like what he or she sees. If he or she does like it, it's not exploitation. That's the golden rule of exploitation.

I love that this article is sandwiched between outrage of the objectification of women.

Exploitation is exploitation, even when perpetrated against members of traditionally exploitative social classes.

So... you are making sweeping, unqualified, -global- statements about the -inherent nature- of a group and then using cultural examples to back it up. And hyperbole, and frankly dismissive ad hominem against every single person who has disagreed with you regardless of their reasoning or way of stating it.

The way that…

Right, because it blows your entire argument out of the water, therefore it can't be used.

Do you really believe that? If so, it's very sad and i'm sorry you've been treated like that, but seeing women as subhuman is pathological, so I don't really think a majority of men are/have/will see woman as subhuman. That would certainly be met with some offense (and possibly bewilderment, since that was my…

I think it's funny when people preach about respect but won't give any. I read both sides of this crap and I'm always amazed at how much the two sides sound alike. There's about as much respect for men on these threads as there is for women on the MRA comment boards. If you're serious about rooting out sexism, you…

The gender prejudice shown by your post is astonishing. It wouldn't be acceptable to make sweeping statements about "black people" thinking "they're entitled to steal your shit - well not ALL of them, just the vast majority".

This story makes me feel so lucky. Our dog, a Portuguese Cattle Dog named Ace, is a pretty protective fella. He has a tendency to sit on my feet when I sit down. He is a great dog. However, when he was smaller, my friend came out to deliverer something and he got bit by by my dog. Blood was drawn, my friend taken to…

I don't care if the science doesn't prove it.

I'm so glad it wasn't a pit. I would have to spend the rest of the day/week explaining the innocence of my own dog. Again.