thebalcony
thebalcony
thebalcony

BAIIPlus, it is discipline specific. she is not strictly in a finance dept, she’s in finance and economics and she is working and publishing as an economist. show me one tenured prof in her dept doing similar work who has published that little and been tenured there. show me one tenured faculty member at a top 20 (or

ha. no, not him. i’d imagine his lawyers have him under pretty tight lock and key at the moment. sadly, i made the burner to weigh in on another academic related post last week and just used the same one. if i knew then that it would have legs, i would have def gone with a bsg inspired name...

blantons, her alleged harassment. Like everyone else here I know nothing of those claims or their veracity. I can certainly apply odds of likelihood and that would lean pretty strongly toward them being true claims because untrue claims are incredibly rare. I do think, however, that it does not help her case that it

And I don’t include the Rivista di Politica Economica piece from 2011 because it is entirely unlikely that Columbia, or any top school, would consider it a quality peer-reviewed publication in their review, being that it is 448th ranked econ journal (https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.journa…) by impact. But even if I

suspiciously? it is suspicious to bring up someone’s publication record in a discussion of their tenure case at a research one university? yes i am intent on bringing it up bc/ people keep conflating the harassment allegations and her tenure portfolio. those are not peer reviewed publications in google scholar (they

catnip, that just confirms what I was saying. she was “supposed” to be according to her clock be reviewed for tenure last year 2014-2015 (hired in 2008 with no leaves shown on her CV that would have been tied to an extra year on her clock), and it seems like given the legal wrangling they postponed a final review of

Given the entanglement of her claims of harassment and her tenure bid, I think it is important for you to have looked at the tenure side of this more closely. She had 2 publications in the 6 years she spent as a tenure-track assistant professor prior to the onset of the alleged harassment in 2011. To be on track for

she was appointed in 2008, she should have gone up for tenure last year. they didn’t “accelerate” her clock as she claims - she had an extra year as it was. she is claiming they were going to give her more time and then decided not to (either as a straight decision, or as she claims after indicating they would). there

She was never going to get tenure anyway. Check out her website and CV, She has been a tenure-track faculty member for over a decade since 2005 (3 yrs at NYU Stern and then from 08-present at Columbia Business School), and has just 2 peer reviewed publications with one additional one apparently in press. I know