The fact that you are separating shows into “good” and “bad” is the antithesis of the point.

Hahaha, jesus, no. Just..NO. PV is not 60 minutes, goddamn. If I gave you 10 million dollars and a camcorder, you literally could not possibly do a worse job then them, TRUST ME. I live in DC, everyone here, including Conservatives, know they are a joke. Just stop already.

You have to at least try to do better to defend PV, ffs. They have literally uncovered NOTHING of consequence. All that money, wasted. They are lucky they’re Conservatives so there’s not a Peter Thiel looking to bankrupt them, which could easily be done with enough financial backing.

This fucking world gets worse and worse.

Well? Is he going to answer the questions or not? If you talk to him, please let him know being silent only makes him look guilty.

That’s the irony. This is the one time that the way Rick is acting MAKES SENSE. It actually fits in with his character and the plot! There was no convoluted nonsense (or no moreso than usual for a zombie apocalypse), just Rick fumbling his way forward. THAT makes sense. “Super-great-plan Rick” never makes sense.

Physician, heal thyself. Nice logic: if only the show would be “good and making sense”. OHHHHH THAT’S the issue! Jeez, if only this show about the zombie apocalypse would have just MADE SENSE, all this anger could have been avoided!! Well done, sir!! Have you approached the showrunners with this breakthrough?!?

This is such a horrible review, lol...the main question to ask 99% of the commenters (and Rob) is, “When did The Walking Dead hurt you?”

I think people having the audacity to declare the show is dead, because they personally don’t like it, or got bored with it, or whatever, is utter bullshit.

I work in an industry parallel to the TV/Film industry. I occasionally deal with metrics like Nielsens. I promise you, nobody gives a shit that people on the internet don’t like the show. I mean LOOK at the ratings, lol. It dwarfs anything else right now.

Counter-point: #allmonthsmatter

EVER. Conveys a ton of plot and tone barely saying a word. Love watching that scene.

Fair enough. My point being is that if this were for something more abstract, impressionistic, etc. there would be far more room for artistic license without anybody commenting.

It’s specifically for the National Portrait Gallery. Realism is kind of their thing, especially for a First Lady (let alone the first African-American first lady). Someone saying “it doesn’t look like her” is completely acceptable here.

While true, the unfortunate result is that the Professor will guaranteed rationalize it by saying the ends have justified the means. The class is about “Cultural Freedoms”, not legal (apparently), so the more outraged people are about him speaking the word, the more he will say it is why using it was necessary to…

This is not a true statement. Certain narrow types of “inciting, provocative, or offensive speech” are not protected. Or at the very least, in the setting described, this would be a incredibly large mountain to climb to prove legally.

Yep! You nailed it! Good luck to you!

This guy is clearly a recently graduated film student. You try to talk sense to him, he just doubled down on being wrong.

It’s okay to be wrong, guy. Don’t worry, someday you’ll get enough experience. Btw, if you need some VFX work done, I know tons of places who can do it for dirt cheap. Hit me up!

I’m not saying you can’t go out with a good, small crew with an Arri Alexa and some people who are dope at their job and not get good/fantastic results. But this isn’t that type of production.