No. Actually, they don’t.

Naw. Not the same (you did point that out I do realize).

What good does the KKK do?

I rather enjoyed this comment. lol

Once again I said IF those things were true it is not unwarranted to mention them.

No. You can’t read and comprehend. Saying: No. It’s not wrong to talk about how the Krims were as employers as it seems to be part of Ortega’s cast DOES NOT EQUAL oh she was justified in killing the kids.

No one is defending her merits as a mother. Good Gawd - ya’ll in your feelings and can’t read.

I’m not saying that. I’m saying that is what it looks like her defense will be so it is relevant to the story. I mean - once again - you can’t read and comprehend.

I agree about private schools.

People leave their kids behind all the time to help provide a better life. So it didn’t work out as she planned - what has any of this to do with the original point of commenting about whether the Krims were good employers or not inappropriate based on the fact it’s likely to be a part of her defense?

Yeah. I clearly didn’t say any of that. But my intelligence is low. Gotcha.

People sacrifice to give their kids a better life. So no I don’t view paying for private school for your kid as a bad financial definition as much as a desperate one. You’re trying to ensure your kid has a better life - and when you’re that close to money you really understand the difference between them and everyone…

What are you rambling about?

The trial just started so how does it “sound like it.” Notice I said IF they are bad employers there is nothing wrong with highlighting that. Which is what all this is about - OP complaining it was wrong to say anything about the Krims other than they are grieving parents.

Yeah. Nobody said any of that.

Notice I didn’t say they “owed” her anything. I was pushing back on the narrative of them being “good” employers. These comments are thick with classicism and learned helplessness. No one believes the kids deserved to die - but this doesn’t give the Krims a pass on potentially bad behavior on their part.

I don’t disagree with anything you said.

“She was jealous of their life and their money and that’s on her, not them.”

There’s no connection being made - other than she seemed to want to make them feel pain b/c she felt trod upon - My comment was one shouldn’t report the Krims in solely a sympathetic light b/c their kids were murdered even if they were not the best of people as well - which is what the OP was saying. We can - or so I…

You keep missing where no one said she was justified in killing the kids. Just that the Krims may not be great either and complaining that no one should say that is a bit much and possibly not accurate.