Used to own one - and I’ve found myself in the weird position of acknowleding that it was a complete failure, but still defending it. This is partly because I bought mine right after getting out of a dieing, but not uncomfortable relationship (so it’s tied to a good time in my life). My view?

Yep. Small was the only thing they promised and actually delivered.

Colorado Native here. Been eating Beau Jo’s my whole life. I like the Cajun style mountain pie. It has cheddar, jalapenos, red onion, andouille and Italian sausage as well as a slightly Spicer red sauce.

What you’ll want is the 2 door 3.0 v6 from the galant. 

The GT is not worth it. The ride is not great and the acceleration only works a couple of times before there is a thermal issue and it slows it down. The Premium is well appointed. If you have not go try to test drive back-to-back. The premium is much nicer day to day.

For real, if the 130 mini cooper was 15k and not 35k it would have sold well

For the 100th time… the tax credit is not a discount coupon. People still have to finance the car and pay interest respective to the original MSRP.

Maybe this was meant to be sarcastic, but all the decent products in the market being prohibitively expensive is not the argument against EV’s I’d expect from most boomers.

As the owner of a 2010 GT500 and a 2007 Navigator, I am getting tired of getting low teens mpg and have been seriously considering Mach Es, as a replacement for the Navi, but my issue is I would only want the GT version and cant stomach spending over 60k on one, and used ones are still mid to upper 40s.

Gee, maybe they’d sell more if every EV the general public can afford wasn’t awful...

Every time one of these massive corporations buys out a brand like this, it’s always a death knell.

I don’t need to pile on to the (correct) consensus that you are a butthurt, intelligence-impaired snowflake crying about how your rights are being impinged (which they are not) by the evil environmental crusaders, or that your suggestions that emissions go “into the engine” and are “good for the environment” as well…

You’re obviously a complete fucking moron, and probably an asshole - maybe even an employee of Sinister Mfg, too. 

Yeach, sure, you are being a douche for racing purposes. Ive got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell to anyone who believes thst.  If so, turn in your plates and use your truck off of public roads only.

Nice first comment, bro! “The emissions is good for the environment” might be the dumbest thing I’ve read today, and I spent the day answering customer emails at work!

“Not all “deleted” not “defeated” do it to roll coal. They do it for racing and to stop from putting soot and contaminates into their engine. The emissions is good for the environment but not the engine. Also, when deleted, fuel mileage goes up. So better mileage? More efficiency? How is that bad. With a proper delete…

“How is that bad.”

Fascinating. Remarkable. Where did you get your PhD in environmental science and mechanical engineering? I would love to understand how all of the wrong things you’ve just said are correct actually.

You’d get even better mileage if you didn’t drive a GD truck all over the damn place every day for no reason. 

1993 Mitsu Pajero - Paid