Easy mistake to make, since they're virtually the same company now.

Other folks have addressed the linguistic issues, but I'd argue it's not a bad name for the movie in the first place, considering about 2/3 of the movie takes place in the Sugar Rush game. Ralph might be the protagonist, but saving Sugar Rush is the primary plot point.

I'm not arguing against the next generation of consoles; to the contrary. The PS4 looks like a joy to develop for because it's basically a PC with extremely standardized architecture; so it's not much different than making a game for Steam, except that you don't have to iron out the bugs from five thousand possible…

Holy shit, this was some great esoteric comedy. I'm going to pretend the final paragraph that deflates the balloon doesn't exist.

No, it's not worth $10, but it was $1.99 on iOS when it was on sale. It was definitely worth that.

All great points, actually. I admit I was highly annoyed when the response of the Vox Populi to having the tables turned was to immediately slaughter everyone in sight who looked rich or "wore glasses." The fuck? Equality isn't some zero sum game where the poor can't wait to get their chance to eat the rich. It is…

yea i agree bro fuk all dat 8 bit shyt bring on dat DUBSTEP LETS ROCK BRO #classof2015 #YOLO

You're going to have to explain what you mean by "severe story issues." With the exception of Vigors not really fitting into the narrative, the plot was fantastic.

They're a bit of a pain in the ass, especially on hard. But they actually can be fun to fight!

Bwahaha. That's lowbrow as hell, but just esoteric enough that lolz were had.

Do you know any gamers? We are all talking about it ad nauseum. Go on the Penny Arcade forums or the SA gamers forum or wherever you talk about games; there's dozens of pages per day being generated.

Wow, that's a humdinger of a controversial opinion. I will absolutely give you this: 2 had hands-down the best combat. It was a direct improvement on BS1's combat, and Infinite is straight-up worse than either due to its regenerating shields necessitating utterly chaotic combat, as has been covered on this site.

You have beaten the game, right?

Anything is possible when you can afford The Who as your theme song.

Whoa, I had no idea about this. That's what I get for being a PC gamer in the late 90's!

Done.

Clay Fighter was Visual Concepts, they didn't make Earthworm Jim. That was Shiny Entertainment.

Nintendo actually embodies a lot of the principles I just mentioned in their best work, but they also exist in a weird, annoying space where I have to buy their console to play their games. Which I always do, and then always end up with a console with 8-10 good games, all but one or two of them first-party. Every damn…

Here's what I wish: I wish gamers would stop demanding that graphics get better every single year. I love gorgeous graphics as much as the next guy, but this constant demand for more and more photorealism has gotten us to a point where big-budget, pretty-looking games have budgets and credits the same size as (or even…

Holy shit, do I ever love this website Game Design Reviews. It eloquently and succinctly points out things that have always bugged me in games, but that I lacked the design prowess to specifically name.