As you well know by now, after 5 minutes that ball ceased to exist. It could have been found 5 minutes and 5 seconds later, or 5 months and 5 days later in bounds, out of bounds or in Taylor Swifts ass covered in gold, and none of it would have mattered...as is stated clearly in the Decisions surrounding Rule…

The only four (4), scenarios where the official could have absolutely declared the ball lost and sent Ian back to the tee would be;

The official didn’t say the ball was lost outside the hazard the official wrongly declared that it was lost, period. That was a mistake on his part. What he should have done was to consult with the player, his marker and, “all readily accessible information”, to determine if the ball was determined to be in the…

I have no emotion regarding this. You don’t like Ian, so you don’t like the correct ruling he got. That’s letting your emotions dictate the stupid things you’ve said here.

Lived in Canada for a long long time....what the fuck is a bunny hug? This is literally the first time I’ve ever heard that. Is that a type of donut?

So to summarize, you disagree with the rules , (as stated, in detail), that every player is and would be entitled to, simply because you personally don’t like the player in question.

The differeence is...is that the only thing I care about is the rules and how they were implemented during the situation...YOU on the other hand don’t give a fuck about the rules or the situation, you just think Poulter is a dick so he’s not entitled to his fair ruling.

Well...then the facts would indicate that it was the official who tried to bully Ian into declaring a lost ball, when by the rules he and his marker agreed that the was most likely in the hazard.

We don’t disagree...you disagree with the rules. Two different things.

26-1/1.3

The official knows the rules and when he did what he did, he was right. The only person who is doubting him is you. How can you not see that? The thing with the #RulesofGolf is that there is no interpretation, they are the most black and white rules in sport. If you actually played golf, or cared about it’s rules…

26-1/1.3

So Jordan just went a long and/or lied, then Jordan should have been DQ’d.

That’s crazy, I would have thought for sure that the armless and legless torso found in the water would have been identified as Bob.

The official didn’t know that the ball where the ball landed because he never saw it land and he never saw it’s flight. When he saw the video, he agreed with the players that it was a virtual certainty it was n the hazard. So I guess, even you’re going to stick by your story that he thought it didn’t go into the…

They found the ball after 5 minutes which means absolutely nothing, as is clearly stated in the rules.  It was that simple. Again, if you’re saying Ian cheated you are by default also saying Jordan cheated.

The official was never right. The official didn’t know with absolute certainty if the ball was in the hazard or not. He couldn’t have. He never saw the ball either leave the tee or land. Funny...when he watched the replay he agreed it was a virtual certainty that the ball was in the hazard, so really all you’re…

Laaaaaaaammmme take

Barry Bonds is also on record as saying that Ichiro could win a Home Run Derby if he wanted to. It’s not so much to say that BP dingers are a dime a dozen...there’s a youtube video of him hitting 10 in a row....it seems more a statement that a number of players think that Ichiro could have been an even more prolific…

Anyone else ever heard Gregg Zaun rant about how much he can’t stand Ichiro because he says Ichiro could have hit 600 dingers? He says, watch him hit BP and he hit’s it out all over the yard like a joke, both fields and he despises that he stands up there and hits singles? He says Ichiro could have hit 40 every…