[...]you’re here too. Asking questions, giving opinions, generally stating your view of the world.

Up until this contrary statement, I haven’t been arguing at all. A response is not an argument. A dismissal is not an argument. A statement of fact is not an argument. And an agreement is certainly not an argument.

Agreed.

Considering there aren’t that many billions of people on the entire planet, I think we’d be safe to, yeah. But, obviously, I was making a point about your rhetoric. I really don’t understand why you’re trying to dodge the points I’m making by using literal understandings that make me spell it out for you, as if you’re…

Like anyone gives a shit what you think.

Like anyone gives a shit what you think.

Agreed.

Wait, what? A poem wasn’t legal doctrine?!! Has anyone told Emmerson!?!

I’m not here to answer your questions, comrade.

For the most part, yes. Closeable when necessary, but otherwise as wide open and acccepting as possible.

Like anyone gives a shit what you think.

Like anyone gives a shit what you think.

Like anyone gives a shit what you think.

Sorry, did you plan on ever answering the fucking question?

Computers do. Every single time you see a human formatted time (like “12:36 PM” or something) on a computer, it has gone through a really (REALLY) stupid translation from the actual measurement, which is shown in decimals.

I’m not here to answer your questions, comrade.

Yes, absolutely. Although “wrong” is a little bit loaded, here. I think praising Barbara Bush is wrong, so I agree. But I also think it’s “meaningless”, which is what I’ve been trying to get across about the inverse.

I mean, honestly, I don’t see how any of those statements are helpful, beyond person pacification.

I’m not here to answer your questions, comrade.

Sorry, which response are you responding to? Kinja doesn’t make it easy to be clear.