To be fair I always start my day with a bottle of whiskey and an open dictionary pointing to random words. Doesn’t everyone?

Honey Poo Poo.

Duck Fucked Dynasty?

Bitter much?

WTF? What the hell are you talking about? Who said anything about “gay”? You need to work on your reading comprehension. And why are you defending a right wing troll? Are you a troll too?

Struck a nerve, did I? Have you tried Tinder?

I read “Rosemary: The Hidden Kennedy Daughter”. What is clear to me from that very thorough book was that she sometimes thrived and other times did not depending upon where they placed her. For example, she thrived at the Montessori School in London. So I’m not convinced that she was regressing and violent, I think…

I read the same book a couple months ago! It was very well done. What a tragedy.

I read “Rosemary: The Hidden Kennedy Daughter”. The impression I got from that well written and pretty thorough book, was that it was a parent’s misguided attempt to control their child (given JFK’s political ambitions) and mitigate embarrassment.

Billy Jean King? You’re kidding me?

Yeah, but Rosemary Kennedy requires a hell of a lot more range than Birdman. I’m not sure that she is up for the task. I hope I’m proved wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time, nor the last.

I wonder if she is really up for the task.

There is some dispute about what Rose knew and when however, and whether Rose was being a revisionist when her autobiography was being prepared.

I read “Rosemary: The Hidden Kennedy Daughter” recently. It is fascinating to realize that back then, doctors were clueless about the causes of developmental disabilities. Rosemary became disabled because Rose was in the middle of labor and was made to hold the child inside her until the doctor arrived for the birth,…

For those who have not read a lot about it, I recommend a book I read a couple of months ago: “Rosemary: The Hidden Kennedy Daughter” by Kate Clifford Larson. It was fabulous. I typically don’t read non-fiction (I prefer fiction), but was really impressed by how well they covered the story.

A couple of months ago, I read “Rosemary: The Hidden Kennedy Daughter” by Kate Clifford Larson. It was fabulous. I typically don’t read non-fiction (I prefer fiction), but was really impressed by how well they covered the story.

Remember, if it’s Bernie, there is nuance, with Hillary there is only villainy. Thanks for proving my point, genius.

The vast majority of Trump supporters will only ever vote for a white man, though. I’m not interested in limiting the ethnic and gender makeup of the democratic party to appeal to white men. I’ve pretty much written them off. Why do we need to cater to them specifically?

Alas, no woman has ever followed you*, poor dear.

Can you please link to the comments from Clinton supporters who literally threatened that you were “pissing them off by challenging them” because they are white? Because I started looking at your comment history and found some interesting things. First, you like to use race to attack Clinton supporters for some…