My seven year old came up behind me and said “why is this on gizmodo? I thought that was a technology website”

I’ll vote 3rd party with a clear conscience, I don’t believe that Trump will be glaringly worse than Clinton, because I think that Trump will delegate his job to the careerists and that Clinton will have a lot more success pushing the parts of her platform I disagree with than Trump will. Letting picking experts and…

I would love it if this and its sister sites would stop posting political stuff entirely.

So here’s my understanding of this bizarre article - once again Gizmodo in the tank for Clinton (or at least so anti-Trump that the science part of this publication has flown out the window).

SourceFed’s findings were as close to a “double blind” type study as one could produce, thoroughly explaining in vivid detail…