And look at Laurie Hernandez work it.

No problem! 😀

I’m not sure: I was wondering the same thing, TBH. I merely used the phrase that I read (via David’s quote) was used in relation to Alexis.

Alexis was also in “She’s All That”; s/he was one of the participants in Laney’s (admittedly terrible) live performance art piece. This was Alexis (I think) when Alexis still only publicly identified as male.

Yeah, and People Magazine is also a shit-show of grossness in the article about Alexis passing.

Someone mentions it in an earlier thread, but per Alexis’ brother (David), after Catelyn Jenner’s transition, Alexis no longer referred to herself/himself as transgender asnd preferred to use the term ‘gender suspicious’. Per David, Alexis preferred for either pronoun to be used, dependant on Alexis’ mood.

Wow...that’s too bad. :-( She was entirely too young. RIP, Alexis.

You beat me to it - I thought of this movie too. *shakes fist*

I totally agree (re: center of attention).

YES.

Is it wrong that, as soon as I heard this, I flew to this site in order to devour the deliciousness that is the comments section. Flew. Like a witch on a broomstick.

I’m not sure if the following is why, but I’d hazard it justifiably factors into it: he’s known for dating women who are just barely legal (Lindz & Demi Lovato) and notoriously played kiss/tell about his bedroom activities with the former (on Howard Stern, no less).

While I feel like Reynolds & Lively are (probably) perfectly nice people, I still get the sense they are exhausting to know in some unexplained way.

It’s two entirely different people who are being discussed: Jamie Clayton is whom challenged Bomer regarding accepting the role and Jen Richards who elaborated on the (presumed) impact of such casting. It seems as if people are conflating the two statements/actions to make their point.

I would’ve been able to take your statement about compassion and understanding at face value if the discussion with you hadn’t been framed by your initial following statement:

I’ve heard from multiple people that a genre-show actor can make a pretty decent living via cons*, irregardless if the person is from a ‘big’ or ‘cult’ show. But it is especially applicable to shows that are able to generate multi-generational fans (such as the Whedon-verse shows, Star Wars & Star Trek, and Doctor…

If a person is willing to quit their job for a 1:20 chance of a relationship that (provided you even survive as ‘the final rose’) then has a 50/50 chance of being long-term or palatable (once the cameras stop rolling) should instead be making a stink about their life choices.

The tweets Marx & Sparks posted are not from the same Transwoman who was initially blocked by Bomer. Jamie Clayton was who was blocked by Bomer, but Jen Richards posted the series of tweets about violence to underscore Clayton’s point. Lastly, I don’t think either set of tweets were that extra; pointed, perhaps but…

It’s non-empathic responses like yours that are the exact reason why folks with long-term/misunderstood illnesses are reticent in sharing their experiences. If you (and I don’t mean a general ‘you’…but you the commentor) are not a doctor nor had to deal with medical issues that have or will upend your life, perhaps…

Once upon a time, I would’ve said ‘no’ but after what I’ve seen this past election season, I will say yes some people would think that. ;-)