the-nope
Shift24
the-nope

No thats what I thought, I just wasnt sure if maybe you could alter the lights to show it? Like change the lighting so 6k is Redline (or w/e it is). Though it would be nice to wring that M62 out a little further, feels like it would. And I have heard with power adders 186mph is about it.

Funny you say the pixel issue, I just had my 540i dash fixed (as seen above fixed) because the ribbon was going bad and all you could see was “ASlEn EAT ETS”. And i mean the gray is not bad, maybe if i see it in person it would be better but just prefer the black. Although I might be bias.

I know it’s the M5 gauge but I’m not a fan of the gray background.

As a fan of the Accord, the 10th gen is as you said its just a good car. I got to drive one a 1.5T with a CVT and its just ok. I have had more fun in my sisters 94 accord Vtec with an auto than this car. And even with the transmission issues I would take one over this. The CVT is just plain annoying and for almost

Yeah I keep forgetting the GMT900 came out over 10 years ago now. Feels like a few years ago but yeah I would still take one of the older gens. Just cheaper over all, to work on and maintain if something does go wrong. The GMT900 had some early issues but got better near the end. I hear the GMT 2kxx are pretty much

Ha questionable reliability. Every gmt400 and gmt800 on Craigslist near me has over 200k or has been a garage kept vacation only vehicle. They are great if you follow the service intervals but 90% don’t and that’s were you run into trouble. Even then they still take the abuse. The main problem is when people over load

Yep totally agree it was performance at a great price, the nsx was a Halo car for the brand. And it’s what separated them from Toyota. And I forgot about the worst of them all the CR-Z. So much potential ruined by throwing a hybrid drivetrain at it.

The NSX was true with a possible v10 if I remember correctly. Though i never heard an S2K replacement rumor. And if there was it was only for hype, they werent actually going to make it especially after the recession.

I am a Honda fan and even so i have been very hard on them. Its taken Honda this long to finally own up and admit they screwed up. I have no doubt they will turn it around and they are taking step in the right direction with the Type R and NSX. But the first step is admiting you have a problem, next is actually doing

1965 Riviera. Made only one year with them but imo one of the classiest looking cars ever

Why hide-aways are better. Might increase drag but look a whole hell of alot better

Now playing

Must be a thing today, one just hit a bridge near cbus today.

Car wise no. That will probably never change and more than likely i will never own a new car. I want to try all sorts of cars and my lineup kind of shows that since its all over the map, Japan, Germany, and US. Plus it doesnt seem worth it losing up to 25% of the cars value before you hit the DMV. I mean at the

Now that would make sense, the tank amount probably should be they took it from 3/4s tank to 1/4 tank and measured it there. But they need to specify what the conditions are for that certain gas mileage. City I agree could be very difficult to reproduce but give some parameters. And from what I have seen with my

Yeah I think he was going just for the x5 name. Though i like them even if it did try to hard, they looked classy for the time.

Yeah but as an engineer i want the full array of numbers and i get mileage may vary but the EPA should be close to the national average. Some will get lower but some will be higher. They even say it on the window sticker “you can save $xxxx if you buy this car”. BS, if you are going to put claims on there you need to

Bullshit those are real numbers in city and even highway. Seen countless real mpg claims and ecoboosts are getting like 16 max in city.

I dont get the amber thing. If its a separate flashing light, how hard is it to miss? The ones i dont like are the ones that function as a brake light and a turn signal. Even so, something is flashing at you why would you not pay attention to it?

Which I agree. I am just saying its a good name for marketing . Im one where I would never replace a V8 in a truck for a V6. (though the GM 4.3L is becoming a beast). To me you need that low end torque and power to be able to get out of certain situations. Two weeks ago at Mid Ohio a guy had a Eco F150 pulling a

Not a Ford fan but Eco-boost. Ford was very smart in marketing It. I remember looking at configuraters for there trucks and no where did it state that there is a turbo. It said a new powerful V6 making the power of a V8 with the economy of a V6. And if you show it to a non car person, they would love it. It’s boosting