thatotherguy123
Nomdeintermets
thatotherguy123

The one where her arms where flailing around towards the ball and away from her body? (Sure, she attempted to dodge, but you just lied about her arm position to say it was “just like”?

Terrific aim! Wow...right down the middle of the goal...not even close to the posts. That Lucy bronze person is surely the sports greatest sniper!

From a graphic design POV, this is objectively bad. The “C” is lost and the white space is confusing and distracting...anthropomorphic chub fish (or fish chub:-) would be better 🤷‍♂️

Lol...USMNT should totally jump on that bandwagon 🤣

What is the relevance of saying “2 goals out of 3 shots on target” as evidence of “clinical finishing”? The fact that you had to specify “on target” implies the exact opposite.

Yes, what were they thinking...leaving the captain (who scored both goals) in a close game! Sure they won...but she didn't even score a hat trick 🤣

I'm not convinced the second one was actually a foul, that was embellished hard. But as for Spain setting a physical tone? Absolutely, and they basically asked for it...nobody but themselves to blame for losing the benefit of the doubt.

Lol...my bad, Morgan wasn't fouled on either penalty, so she probably should t have started if she was showing signs of injury, but Rapinoe buried both penalties, so her experience and focus was probably something the coach felt was too important to go without.

But those two players influenced the 2 goals, and they won.

It is harder to get creative when you actually play against 11 soccer players instead of orange practice cones.

Great run, leading to a sublime assist to the streaking Spanish defender🤣

Because of chronology. 

“All she could do was draw fouls”, the game was decided by penalties!  and she and Rapinoe should have been subbed? Were 2 or those 5 fouls the penalties that Rapinoe converted? If so, this sounds hilarious. Your argument is that the two players who created the goals, by being fouled and converting the

None. Check her byline. If we wanted a comment from harry styles , or some hobo who also thinks that cooking wine is for drinkin’

Check her byline...this was never a serious inquiry. 

I just checked her byline...she's never written for deadspin. Perhaps if deadspin wanted a comment they would have asked one of their actual reporters to inquire...not the new guy who's probably an intern, and only written about harry fucking styles, cooking wine, and a book review (which I will now read, her intro

It does. She’s not even a soccer blogger...she’s not even a sports blogger! Why would they respond to her? She’s written about “sherry”, “harry styles”, and did a book review.

Check her byline...she isn’t even that! Her other blogs have been about, no joke... “cooking wine”, “harry styles”, and a, “young adult lit review”. That's it!🤦‍♂️ Until today's absolute gem of a deep dive, investigative piece🤣

Perhaps they looked at your bio, and felt that these questions didn't have anything to do with either, Spanish cooking wine, British boy bands, or YA lit?

It’s true...I love deadspin, but she isn't even one of the deadspin soccer bloggers. Never heard of her. I'd recognize hundreds of Deadspin/gawker media bloggers, past or present, man and woman...and I have no idea who this blogger is.