I too was confused by this and would enjoy clarification

This hurts my soul. As someone with a Fiero and a motorcycle, I'm certain combining them would be less than the sum of the parts. 1+2 =-1

Or that was the excuse they used to cover up that the gigantic hood was to improve the terrible crash safety of the previous Montana/Venture U-vans

The Taycan Turbo agrees

Something about continentals that makes people want to shorten them it seems

This is why I read jalopnik, the comments that give as much or more insight than the article

It doesn't have seatbelts, but look at the upholstery!

*squeals like a little schoolgirl in excitement*

This is the content the world needs now, and the reason we come to Jalopnik

Jalopy beatnik

Isn't GM's MO to be innovative, bungle the launch, fix it a couple years on, then cancel it? 

See also: Black Sabbath, Iron Maiden, Electric Wizard

Doooooo ittttt. 

Lukewarm take, the Model T is the OG crossover. High ride height, coupe styling, moderate off road ability, huge wheels. 

Agreed, surge brakes suck. But them again, so does trailer wiring and connectors, which might be the least reliable electrical system ever devised.

Ooh this is easy, my parents (in my totally unbiased opinion) drive cool shit. Pictures stolen from google.

I approve of all of these messages

I feel as though frontal area is missing from this discussion

What I find most humourous about this recommendation is that there are states not requiring motorcycle helmets, why would they require bicycle helmets?

The hammers comparison really blew my mind, I feel like it says a lot about currency and bartering and the societal value we place on wealth. Plus the mental image of opening a garage and seeing a huge pile of hammers is hilarious, like the storage unit in breaking bad, but with hammers.