It plays a lot like FF12. So it’s a hybrid of turn-based and real time. I would consider it a JRPG long before I’d consider it an action-RPG in the vein of Kingdom Hearts.

Which monitors are used in that image? because that’s prettymuch perfect.

MISSSINGNO

Please understand.

On the steam front page, in the big carousel of games, you can change what kind of stuff that shows up there by hovering over the image, and clicking the customize button that appears in the top right. (This lets you hide/show early access, pre-orders, and more from being shown front and center.)

Review copies of the original game or the expansion? because that would be just weird.

It looks kind of bat-man-ish.

Why does everyone in Thedas keep their hair short in DA:I? Technical limitation or artistic direction?

The FFXIV thing reminds me a lot of my time with FFXI and the ludicrous PlayOnline launcher. They also didn't do prepaid cards (where I lived), and being a minor without a credit card (but with a job) I did some pretty sketchy shit to get online to play with my pals.

I must say, I had some epic feels at the end of FF7:CC as well. The rest of the game felt like a bit of an identity crisis (trying to be somewhat kingdom-hearts-y in scope while still trying to fit on a handheld and have content that's bite-sized enough for the handheld community)

There's a lot of people crying about how this is any different from any other exclusive content (in terms of actual games, and not just DLC).

((Today is backwards day))

Because, when it's good, it's good. When it's bad, it's really bad.

Twitch isn't really all about watching the best of the best. Most people go to watch people with personality over watching people who're good at video games.

There isn't really one unified body here. The concept of "Gamer" has become large enough that it's more than capable of conflicting and disagreeing with itself.

It's effectively abusing fair use laws in how it's being handled today. By law, I'm allowed to use (and profit from) content you've created as part of a critique or parody (general journalism also gets a special pass). Taking down a video because it has images of your product in it on youtube, in spite of it being a…

It really depends. If you think the criticism levvied against you is unfair, you should be highlighting why you feel it's unfair instead of resorting to legal threats (which, IMO, is also a no win situation.) and pointing out how your reviewer(s) have glossed over the things you think make your product good.

Yeah. It'd cost money to put someone in charge of watching videos being hit with a takedown request and make a human decision to investigate.

Fighting back would be releasing a video critiquing Mr. Sterling's critique. Fighting freedom of speech and fair use laws with more freedom of speech and fair use laws.

It looks like the author pulled the greenlight page down, so we may never know.