I'm sure it's good for what it is, and I know it's not supposed to be a sporty car, but it seems really, I don't know, tiring? Is that the right word? It's like vehicular NyQuil.
The XF design language translates well, and if the CX-17 keeps the money coming in so Jag can keep making RWD smoke machines[and hopefully a C-X75/XJ220-esque car in the future] than I'm good with it.
+1 because I think Toyota's realizing that it's time to start giving a shit again
the XJ220's wheels on a big white Transit is somehow very appealing
I could live with this design for eleven years
I feel like it wouldn't be that hard to work the current F-150 into a reasonable Bronco
Any vehicle that could potentially be used for camping [T2/Vanagon, 80's Volvo wagon, roofless Bronco, Grand Wagoneer, FJ40, etc, etc] This is upsetting, because they ruin owning these cars for everyone.
inb4: "couldn't get any uglier" because I actually like the Juke
Wow. That really isn't as bad as everyone's claiming. The wheels could've looked far worse, as could the headlights. I think since they stayed pretty tasteful & saved an otherwise doomed F40, they get a pass.