Why would the lens care about colour? Lenses are clear

I actually think you are wrong about this. I guess what you are thinking is that the algorithm has a bunch of ‘if-then’ type statements that deduce what kind of thing is in the picture, and that a POC dev team would have been more sensitive about writing them. But that’s not how they work; instead they *automatically*…

How is it not a mistake? Are you suggesting that Google somehow wrote this behaviour in on purpose?

It almost certainly didn’t behave that way when they released it. It’s self-learning software so its behaviour changes as its sample grows. Also it presumably doesn’t tag most black people incorrectly, but only a very small fraction, such that you couldn’t tell except with an enormous sample set.

It almost certainly does this only very rarely, such that you’d only notice when running on the whole population.

Is it really as open and shut as that? I thought there was at least some reason to believe he might really not have done it.

Is it really that open and shut a case? I haven’t been paying especially close attention but I thought there was at least some reason to believe he might in fact not have done it.

They’re no sure whether there is a serial killer because sometimes sex workers disappear for non-serial-killer related reasons. I thought that was pretty clear from the statement honestly.

...with this one weird trick

Presumably their fame, physical attractiveness, glamour, and millions of dollars

Not to be pedantic, but I do think it is pretty clearly about making her look bad (otherwise it wouldn’t violate her privacy)

it actually seems quite likely that this was *literally* the work of ‘rebellious’ high school kids with sharpies

Okay yes but you actually wouldn’t break up with a guy who didn’t have a penis?

He also might have just made out with them or only gone down on them or something. Who knows?

r/tumblrinaction

The boundary is 100% acceptable. But there should be attention paid to your partner's enjoyment - orgasm or no - within those boundaries, and the article really makes it sound like she doesn't give a shit. Why not just get a vibrator?

Your attitude, while quite reasonable, is also very different from the one the article presents, which isn't so much "I have limits" as "I don't want to do *anything* for my partner's pleasure". Suppose I'm hooking up with you but I have a weird thing about performing oral. The correct attitude isn't "sorry I don't…

This would be true except that she is actually not willing to provide her casual guy with *any* orgasms (it says so in the article). At that point they really are kind of equivalent.

It's not so much the actual blowjobs as her general attitude towards sex that I find a bit off-putting: it's all about the raw physical sensation; any time I spend pleasuring my partner is time I'm not receiving pleasure so what's the point; my future partners are somehow accountable for my previous ones.

She really is kind of saying that though: The only thing I give him in return is a pat on the back for doing a good job.