Could those four small statues next to the globe be the playable races?

Saying that they could loose money for that long does not mean that they will. To me it sounds like it could be a good investment since it has its own capital to use during slumps, without having to stop or prioritize between different r&d-projects and development. Nintendo has net assets of 1 trillion yen (10 billion…

Why would that make shareholders pull out?

You gave a definition of good with two variables “Morally excellent, satisfactory to high in quality.”. I think that is a perfectly valid definition of good, but the two variables are not self-explanatory.

You did give answers to why you find this thing morally unsound as well as lacking in quality. I should’ve been…

I would say we’ll use the generally accepted definition of Good: Morally excellent, satisfactory to high in quality.

I would say the scope makes quite a difference.

And also, without defining good the whole proposition is more or less, empty. Sure, good is great, but what is good?

I’m ridiculously exited about the new mass transit hub buildings.

Dictionaries are very useful tools to define terms. They might have other meanings as well, but then to clarify how one use the term it’s very useful.

I stopped playing when I realized that I, i.e a personal opinion, don’t think its a good game.

I felt duped, not by Blizzard but by myself. Why had I been spending money on the game when I really didn’t feel it while thinking something in the lines “when I get that card”. Ended up building every deck around Ragnaros…

It is a phenomenon, both definition 1 and 2 fits https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/phenomenon

Of course it is shallow. Calling something stupid and leaving it at that, and on top of that citing the majority as something to back your own opinion is shallow thinking. I’m not calling your entire worldview…

Tell me, what does it say about me?

I’ve never said it’s impressive, I explicitly said it doesn’t seem extremely expressive to me. And I’m not defending anything, what I’m trying to say is that dismissing something on the grounds that you find it stupid is stupid, and just a shallow way to look at the world and human…

Deeper meaning? There is no such thing as deeper meaning. This is interesting because it happened, it had people following it and participating in different ways. You’re need to dismiss it as stupid says more about you than what happened.

I’m in no position to make any assertions as to why he did it, except for the reasons he himself stated which I have no reasons to doubt.

I still don’t see why it matters if it is forgotten? Especially by someone who didn’t think it was something special... except for feeling it was important enough to really underscore how unimportant and unspecial it is and exactly _how little they care._

Because you don’t invest 500 hours into something like this not seeking some attention.

I would argue that, in general, for something to be of value and worth your awe, it should be good.

Why do you assume whether any one, and specifically you, is of any importance to CirclMastr? It seems kind of besides the point.

I’m not arguing that the task in itself really has any value. I argue that every action must be understood as part of its context. Humans, and their actions, are all situated in culture/time/space and they cannot be understood in vacuum.

I don’t know if he would have done it in a different set circumstances. And I…

You can stare at a wall if that’s what you want, but it would indeed be classified as a waste of time.

There is a piece of artwork in the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art that is just a canvas painted white, with instructions from the artist to paint in a new coat of white every now and then following a certain interval (Or at least it was there when I visited back in 2005). Don’t remember the name of the artist, but…