Despite what anyone claims, the letterboxing was put there to reduce rendering load by about 20%, freeing up memory to maintain a solid framerate and fancier effects.

Didnt tought that you guys had jumped into the hate train. Or below it. This review was embarrasing to read.

whoa, had no idea what Cawthon's backstory was. Interesting read!

I have no idea who Flintheart is, but I know Xanatos.

It's a pretty tough sell to make people feel empathy for creditors. Gordon Gekko has a case for evil when he buys up Blue Star and then wants to liquidate it, laying off thousands of blue collar schlubs, just to make a tall profit.

Fun at parties, etc., etc. He's a super-rich vigilante philanthropist, c'mon now.

Punctuation. Use it.

Spoilers?






I feel like Gekko should be neutral and Gatsby should be evil. Gekko's only "sin" was insider trading, which isn't evil, it just violates regulations. Gatsby, on the other hand, committed fraud on a massive scale to generate his borrowed wealth, leaving creditors with nothing once he died.

But Ming the Merciless is on the list? Am I missing something in pop-culture land?

Smaug isn't that evil the gold attracts him and believe dwarfs would know gold attracts dragons so their overmining forced smaug their in which he then chases them out if they had not mined so much smaug would have never shown up and no one would have died also smaug only leavers and destroys the place cause of the…

I don't mean to be that guy... but.. Tywin Lannister hadn't been rich for some time before his death.

Uh, the original Daddy WArbucks from the Annie comic should certainly be on the "evil" end. I suppose if you are talking about the gruff-but-heart-of-gold Warbucks from the musical -which of course was made as a giant middle finger to the original comic- then that might be OK. But really, the original Daddy Warbucks…

I have seen the complete gameplays for them by Markiplier so if you're scared of the games like I am you can always do that and be caught up on the story like I did. I do hope to play them someday though. Plus they're very short games. I can leave a link for his channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/markiplie…

FNaF and FNaF 2 were actually pretty different games. They had the same basic framework, but the mechanics changed a lot.

The second one is actually very different then the first and the third one offering only a single animatronic will likely be very different then the last two.

I mean, if the characters have already developed this "spooky" public reputation, who would make them the focus of a children's restaurant ever again?

If you hit the lottery as an indie dev would you churn them out too? Yes. As long as people are buying and you can create compelling experiences with low overhead then I think it's silly to hate on the dev.

Good thing there are plenty of other games out there for you to enjoy. You dont have to like FNAF.

Just curious....did you actually play the game yourself or just watch other people play?
Because that seems to take the fun and suspense out of the game entirely.