I don't think so, but i've not been tested so the jury is still out. I just gave you the benefit of the doubt, because of your need to defend/explain yourself. But yeah, now I see i was wrong. You just enjoy being the ass.
I don't think so, but i've not been tested so the jury is still out. I just gave you the benefit of the doubt, because of your need to defend/explain yourself. But yeah, now I see i was wrong. You just enjoy being the ass.
My point was you sound like a pretentious ass, you know you sound like a pretentious ass, but somehow in your mind ending your comment with i know i'm a pretentious ass, makes you not a pretentious ass or immune to someone calling you one (pretentious ass that is)
What do you think mine was?
So? I happen to think you had a good point there.
Dude, it's OK to like what you like, but you had it right the first time "it's pretty easy to tell I'm a pretentious ass". You know it, now you have to accept it.
Nah, it works. I wanted to put in your last comments date as arbitrary cut off point for vintage, but lost interest.
I'd like to reply to your comment but i only read vintage comments, sorry.
You are at least right about one thing.
Well that would give him the rank to talk shit about… noone
so how come you are allowed to say anything about Margaret Cho?
It's actually a quote from the Show ;). But i think selling the bit helps, that is why there were some mildly scary floors before pumpkins, so we learn the visitors are eager to be scared, and willing to overlook some things, like bad costumes and bored actors.
"buy the premise, buy the bit". I'm not from America and we don't have big sketch shows like these, so maybe i had more luck buying into the fantasy. And i really liked it. I get all the comments about it being preachy. And the sketches were bad. And knowing sorkin wrote himself into the role of the genius writers…
I liked fuckable orifices way before you.
No doubt extra much care and work was put into the fuckable orifices. It just makes sense from a financial standpoint. Ugh.
i get what you are saying, and this is all conjecture on my part. But for me the story is William starts to think Dolores is real, is ready to give up his life and everything to be with her and then he is convinced by Ford or someone else that it is "just a story", that Dolores is just a robot who can't feel (maybe…
He is not a psychopath, i think he bought into dolores is a real girl and then has been dissappointed somehow, it's a mechanical world to him, not one with feeling (imo of course and only relevant if you think 2 timelines is possible)
Yeah, i immediately thought of blindfall too. Could ford be a vampire ;)?
you mean this: "The beauty of this long and storied past [of the island] is that one thing has nothing to do with the other - there is no "ultimate Mystery" which requires solving. " yeah, that sounds like lost. Have you read the thing?
For me all the little gimmicks never came together to anything cohesive, push the button, smoke monster, the others etc. It always felt like gimmick of the season, so the show could go on. I liked lost, but it akways seemed like it wanted to tell you this big secret, "but not now, next time when we have more time, …
you know what? Seeing the names in such a close proximity, terence malick making Arrival/Story of your life would have been interesting