Yeah the definite way to level the playing field is for the oppressed to bite their tongues

Your comments have slipped to and fro between absurd and pedantic. Now you combined the two. Talk about your victim-blaming. I can no longer hold my peace.

Yessssssss.

Censorship is all fun and games until you’re the one being censored. I guess what’s good for the gander, is good for the goose this time.

Sorry, but calling all men as trash is sexist speech. My wife drives me crazy, but I would not call all women crazy.

“Men are trash” is simply not the same thing as sexist attacks on women, because you don’t face the systemic oppression that makes sexist slurs so toxic

But you brought that up as a way of deflecting from the actual grim subject of this article. I’m just tired of the hypocrisy. You’re the same kind of asshole who brings up the Crusades in an article about the latest act of Muslim terrorism. It’s pretty transparent and people are over of it.

OK, there’s clearly no reason to have a conversation with you. You’re hell-bent on being obtuse about your true motivation for posting that. Why you felt the need to defensively bring up the racism of police in an article about a black guy slaughtering an elderly black man on Facebook Live is completely beyond me.

You brought up a white example specifically and you mentioned that this black killer was the wrong color. So yes, that is definitely bringing up white people. Let’s not be obtuse.

Black shooters get taken alive all the time. Both of the DC snipers, for instance. Why are you making this about race? Can’t you just criticize the black murderer without bringing up white people as a way to deflect?

Really? I’ve always found him to be cold. I thought a trilogy devoted to Pellaeon would be good. Kinda the “I’m just a working stiff in middle management” meets “Death of a Salesman” vibe. /s but I do think he rolls his eyes at Thrawn every time he does an about face.  

Hey, he managed to shoehorn Trumps name in the article at least 4 or 5 times. He did his job.

“The last time a aircraft carrier has been used in battle was in World War II”

We do not build carriers to fight naval battles against China and Russia. We build carriers to project air power anywhere in the world, at any time, whether we have accessible air bases with mission permission or not. That is what carriers have been used for since World War II and will continue to be used for.

“The last time a aircraft carrier has been used in battle was in World War II.”

Your definition of “used in battle” is fairly exclusionary of the last 70+ years of carrier history, and their air-wing’s contributions to the Korean, Vietnam, Cold, and Gulf wars... not to mention GWOT. But don’t let that get in the way of your narrative.

Welcome back Tie Defender. So glad you could make it.

Your writing ability is excellent, but your knowledge of business and law are lacking.

Aftermath is the worst one. There are really good new EU books. “Bloodlines” from Claudia Grey, “Tarkin” and “Catalyst” from James Luceno, same author who wrote amazing “Darth Plagueis”. Even Zahn is coming in, with “Thrawn”, this Spring.