They're dressed in hijabs and are reading for the Qur'an - how could one avoid mentioning Islam when these girls are apparently being required to practicing it?

Uh...what? These terrorists are much more like Christians than Muslims?

You know what? They're Muslim. Fucking deal with that.

You can't have one without the other.

And here's the standard knee jerk irrational response when somebody has nothing real to say. I can set my watch to this. Good job.

No, sweetie. You're so irrational you immediately start screaming about race instead of slowing down and actually reading the words in front of you. Such intellectual weakness is actually sad to witness. Race irrelevant here.

I mean, I'd call a breach of security which endangers American diplomats and intelligence personnel an act of *betrayal*, which is all that's necessary to label someone a "traitor" colloquially. It wasn't clear to me that the OP intended the legal usage of the word. If you know the OP well enough to infer with…

If you have security clearance and you abuse it by leaking or revealing secure information, you are guilty of a serious crime. Whatever anyone's personal feelings about that, it is a crime. As such, she must serve a prison sentence until she has repaid her debt to society. Pick a charged label of your choice, but…

She's still a traitor.

Good for her, I guess. She's still a traitor, regardless of her confusion or motivations.
Also, so are we as taxpayers going to be paying for her hormone therapy? Because, mreh.

Remember when the IDF collapsed after allowing women in any position?

I know you're a trollio, but we all know the IDF is known for being weak and easy to beat.

Ignoring this trial and only speaking on your comment about what justifies shooting an intruder, the fact that they are intruding justifies it. If someone breaks into my house I can promise you I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later.

Um....it takes an act of congress to pick a tomato?