The Fiero did.

The article’s first assumption is that if the key fob pops the hood, it must mean there’s no engine in there. Assuming that’s correct, we can infer one of the following:

1) GM has found enough room in the back for a V-8 and a retractile top and still had room left over for cargo storage; or
2) There’s no engine ‘cause…

Do mid-engine cars really have trunks?  Seems to me that the more likely answer is an all-electric car.

While hardly ideal, three decades of operation isn’t bad.

Meanwhile, current vacancy in Detroit is still what... north of 20%? Let’s not pretend there’s any great crisis of land shortage today.

Prior to 15 did it lock in a % front and back?

But tell me what *you* know.

You ARE choosing a specific torque split

It’s adjustable front to back.

STI is different it has an adjustable center dif that you can lock.

A Subaru STI with a locking center diff will, as Wyatt says, be 4WD if you look at it this way

It depends on the product. Cereal is a good example.

1. Frosted Flakes knock-offs suck. The frosting comes off immediately, and you’re left with corn flakes in sugar-milk. Stick with Tony.

2. Crunch Berry knock-offs are indistinguishable from the real thing. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn they’re coming off the same…

The way to accomplish this is simple: We need a federal law banning these sorts of subsidies.

It proves that Gore’s 2006 warnings were incorrect, that it was fear-mongering without scientific merit.

The article, like so much of the “consensus,” has dire warnings of the future. But we’ve been hearing these warnings of flooding and catastrophe for decades and without exception, they never come true.

Within a decade, there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro.

...get your Toyota in order.

...claims cars rolling out of Subaru plant are built by Toyota.

But there’s also the Toyota 86, which is a coupe, and which Toyota seems to despise even making.

Here’s a video of Jeep’s flagship AWD system being embarrassed by sedans.

This smells oddly like actual journalism. There appears to have been some amount of research which generated genuinely original information.

I don’t see any hot takes or unsubstantiated editorializing. The headline bears a reasonable relationship to the actual content of the article. I’ve read the article twice and…

I’m not sure if that’s supposed to be “cart-rash” or “car-trash,” but either way, you’ve earned your star.