I don’t think you used the word Republican enough times, and you certainly didn’t mention enough unrelated events.

Ok, let’s say your team signs him. Are you happy? Forget the politics. Are you happy having this QB on your team?

Do you want him on your team? Do you want him to be your QB? Honestly? If you say yes, you’re either lying or trying to look virtuous for your readers.

He still goes home to Kate Upton.

So you learned, from experience, about the risks of car ownership and you don’t think other “stupid” people can learn either?

People are still making the choice to buy a car when they don’t have to. No one puts a gun to sign a sales contract on a car. If the terms aren’t good once you do the math, you can walk away.

No one forces anyone to buy a new car and finance it for longer than they should.

+1. Making things “affordable” is what is making them expensive.

True Millennials don’t buy new cars or used cars. They build them out of artisanal driftwood and penny farthing tires, harnessing the energy of the sun reflecting off the moon.

As an Astros fan, I’m not too worried about that. In the 5 games the Indians won, they beat McCullers once. The other 4 games broke down as follows: 2 against Fiers, 1 against Musgrove and 1 against Morton. They lost their only game against Keuchel. If they do meet in the playoffs, the Indians will not be facing the…

That is a profoundly silly comment.

lol. I’ll defer to your expertise in “cucks.”

What does this even mean?

Can’t speak for Iraq but, having been to every college town in the old Big 8 and current Big 12 (-2) I can say Lubbock makes Ames, Iowa and Manhattan, Kansas look downright charming…

“Hey, I don’t suck! Would a QB who sucked be part of a trade involving a second round pick?”

They made millions off him way more money off him than he did them

Yes it is. Also worth noting he was paid a $16 million signing bonus. Based on the time played under the contract, the Lions could have forced him to repay up to $3.2 million, but only required him to pay back $320k for some sort of cap relief reasons (it’s possible they’re doing 10 year installments, everything I’ve…

Yeah, I don’t understand the criticism either. It is a legal contract, and those are the rules. I don’t think the players association would be cool with teams stiffing players for so much as a dime (and they shouldn’t be), so why are there hard feelings here?

but that doesn’t make it look any less petty to demand that a player who was so central to the team return several hundred thousand dollars as a penalty for choosing to walk away from the game after years of injuries.

Thanks, Pop!