We can certainly tell you’re not at all completely biased and likely a misandrist. You’re one of the first people I’ve ever suggested that about. The other being someone who outright stated they didn’t trust men, believed they were all violent, liars, hated and lacked respect for women and were cruel and vile animals.

hahaha “Have sex with people who are not inebriated and are enthusiastic and clearly enjoying it through the whole process.” - Rethink this statement. What you’re suggesting here (likely unintentionally.) is that if one party doesn’t enjoy it that it is indeed rape, even if they were enthusiastic and gave…

Read my earlier post, you are demonstrably wrong.

You really fell off the deep end here, you made a lot of false assumptions here and a lot of this boils down to guilt by association. To suggest his innocence is NOT to suggest her guilt, that’s a false dilemma/false Dichotomy. You’re missing something here...and that is that it’s possible to be wrong about something…

Are you suggesting it’s ok to revoke consent after you’ve been intimate with a person? I’m not accusing you here, I’m asking you to clarify.

I’m not going to point out the fallacies here (especially with that last point.) but I will still respond. The aforementioned example would be a false rape accusation, the issue is people associate false rape allegations with malice when perhaps that shouldn’t be inherently assumed. Would we assume malice if one…

You didn’t learn anything in this article about how they viewed their literature....you only learned how the author interpreted what was there. Available are a variety of studies (that often conflict with each other.) as to how people perceived not only the world around them, each other and their society...but also…

I think it would be easier if people stopped letting history getting in the way. Previous atrocities need to be let go if we plan to move on. Too much guilt by association.....or indeed ethnicity or sex that is happening today.

I’ve already replied to the person claiming to be the editor of this article above, contained in it is probably about everything I want to say about the actual article right now (yes I simplified it, yes that probably wasn’t what you meant, yes it was rushed through and a bit of a ‘spur of the moment thing’.)

I certainly do not agree with feminists on a lot of issues (or MRA’s for that matter...or anyone haha.) but I did partially agree with some of the contents of this article. I couldn’t help that a lot of this was ‘damage control’ however only those who thoroughly read it would have noticed the importance that was…

Ahhh, they knew perfectly well that gold wouldn’t protect you against a warhammer...

You’re clearly not an enthusiast. Joan of Arc did not take part in battle, she didn’t even wear a full face helmet because of this. Also these boob-plates are not a ‘death wish’...they will still protect you better than merely mail and cloth...not to mention that you should be wearing both of the aforementioned…

“everything should be convex to deflect spear points and sword blades away from the body”...YOU...DO...NOT...NEED...TO...DEFLECT...SWORD...OR....SPEAR...BLOWS...WHEN...YOU....ARE...WEARING 1.5-4MM OF HARDENED STEEL! Swords = pointless against breastplate. Convential spears = pointless against a breastplate (get the…

No....LEATHER, no leather. They wore CLOTH not leather. Leather is rubbish armour and was not really used historically expect for gloves in the late period (14-15th Century.) for Vambraces (14th century only.) and in Japan on some poor-man’s sets of laminar (not lamellar...laminar.) armour.

Fencing with a foil is not even remotely similar to being hit while wearing a steel breastplate.....Even with a boobplate you would be essentially secure against any sword blow even in the sternum and in fact almost all incoming blows. The reason they weren’t shaped like that (apart from maneuverability issues.) is…

An armoured ‘knight’ would probably fall on their chest a lot in battle...that’s why plate armour was made light and maneuverable...so they could...you know...stand up and move around? Jousting armour is completely different from field armour.

Brilliant depiction! Best I’ve seen on this page. Everything else is cringe worthy (I’ve been on an hours binge looking through the comments and firing replies. Think I’m about done with this page now.)

The blunt force trauma of a sword blow is minimal and you certainly don’t need a steel breastplate to absorb it.....

That armour would get her killed. No helmet and no neckguard with a slide aiming at both of these...the first blow to hit the upper part of the breastplate would fly straight into her neck or head, likely killing her, Also no plates on the upper arms but silly ‘vambraces’? Not to mention that silly skirt at the bottom…

If Avelline is the person I saw above who was wearing steel on their and legs (awfully fitted.) and LEATHER across their torso...with no neck or shoulder guard and only a bit of steel on their arms. There’s nothing ‘good’ or ‘relatively realistic’ about it....you’d be much better off with a boobplate or even that…