tealc-is-a-sholva
Teal'c is a shol'va!
tealc-is-a-sholva

"Fat Girl Getting Weight Estimated"

I know this won't be popular here, but if I lived in Detroit, I would probably also be hyper paranoid about people knocking on my door late at night. If someone was claiming their car broke down, I would likely assume they were trying to break into my house. Detroit isn't like other places - it's fucked.

Relativity indeed - there is a difference between a mass shooting, and what I'm talking about. And there's a difference between chatting with a pretty girl and catcalling with a dozen others while she rubs herself over the sudsy hood of an Evo X.

This is pretty funny, but a lot of people will miss the larger point. Sure, there's probably a greater amount of male enthusiasts than female enthusiasts, but it really angers me when I see stuff at events like when they have "bikini babes" seductively wash a car in front of a bunch of leering dudes (and I'm a dude).

Do the models on Tyra's show routinely bite each other in the face? I don't watch.

Yes. That is exactly why. So many problems would be immediately solved if everyone could just get their minds around the notion that women are autonomous individuals who do not exist for the purposes of public consumption.

Why does our society have such a hard time with the concept of "consent"? Is it because we still don't believe women are actual people, and not just livestock/property? Seriously, get it the fuck together, US.

No, he does not have a point. Being in public means that someone can take a photo of your surface appearance, while walking down the street for example, but it does not mean that you can try to get "under the surface", i.e., photograph what is UNDER the surface which pretty much covers underwear. It is reasonable

You are definitely right, but I wish you hadn't replied to him. He should have been left in the gray.

If you have to go out of your way to take a picture of a ladies undergarments then yes I think you have an expectation of privacy. These ladies aren't going around buck naked and getting angry because people took pictures of them. Someone targeted them for harassment and violated their personal space. That's illegal.

Can I argue that introducing my fist to your face counts as free speech too, Masshole?

This is the first time I've laughed at a Godwin. Well done. And super well done arguing against this bigot. They don't even have facts, in one of their previous replies to requests about backing up their claims with studies they say, and I quote, "as if we need a study for that". You can't win against rabid bigotry.

Thank you. This person is a misogynist and their hateful ideas should be fought.

No one is rabidly promoting a practice that wipes out a large percentage of minorities, the poor, and the handicapped. No one supports abortion because they are happy when it happens, and you are just trying to create boogiemen by believing it.

... wow, way to overgeneralize. What makes you think people who don't believe in banning abortion believe in looking down on kids and thinking their parents should have had an abortion?! I certainly don't, and nor do a lot of folks who believe that abortion should be legal.

How did we get from my story of my former fiancee and I having to make a heart-breaking decision and ending the pregnancy because our baby would probably never make it to term, much less take a breath in this world to comparing people who make a decision like that of me and my former fiance to Hitler?! What right

Because "No disrespect, but you are all Hitler because you don't believe what I believe in" totally is?

It immediately brings forth a negative connotation for so many people of angry bra burning women folk when really it's supposed about equality in general.

you're giving these people way too much credit. they aren't basing it on some nuanced difference between say feminism and womanism. this is just "ew, feminists hate men." wtf? i guess i missed that memo.

so fox news gets to define it and we cave in to that? i don't think so.