tealc-is-a-sholva
Teal'c is a shol'va!
tealc-is-a-sholva

Are you doing performance art?

My mom had a stroke, and a stroke killed my great-grandmother.

I like that when everyone else has given up and gone home, you're still in here with me, Ivybug!

You're no fun anymore.

Oh, DMX, noooo!

Yeah, you did say that:

That question was answered, a lot, and you've been told it was answered, a lot.

Ha! Guys, I think we've broken it!

Well, you got an answer. Why are you still making the same point?

Luckily getting corrected here, am I right? :D

Yeah, the lady in this story didn't hold her breast up for view, unfurl it, nor make an ostentatious exhibition.

People can wait. Babies can't. They have to be fed more regularly.

Lol, I just realized you said "beast"!

I know. You said if that's an excuse, all biological functions should be allowed. They obviously aren't so your point was the original argument wasn't sound.

You can bring your children to court, especially to family court, where she was.

But courtrooms don't have rules against breastfeeding, because that one is protected by law.

But breastfeeding is allowed in court. By law. It's not the same thing as peeing in a jar in court or wearing short sleeves in court. Neither has been protected by law and there is a really good reason for the peeing one.

Yup, if there's a baby on the end of it. There's no reason for a baby to suck on your sleeveless arm, and if there is, it happens so rarely that there is no reason to make a law about it and we can all take the baby sucking a sleeveless arm thing on a case by case basis.

Because children have to be fed at certain intervals or they become malnourished and die.