Please. ALL relationships (male/female, male/male, female/female) require sustenance, be it sexual, emotional or mental. Whatever her case was, that was HER truth. Who the hell are you to judge? Speak for yourself. Sheesh.
Please. ALL relationships (male/female, male/male, female/female) require sustenance, be it sexual, emotional or mental. Whatever her case was, that was HER truth. Who the hell are you to judge? Speak for yourself. Sheesh.
There's a bit of a gap between what I really want to say and what I know is responsible to say.
Yeah, these fuckers are monsters, but that doesn't change the fact that all rape is evil.
This jury heard the evidence and believed that Banks committed the crime and that Vanderburg was an accomplice. This doesn't mean that Banks was convicted, and he faces no punishment because of this finding, but there many reasons why co-participants are not (and often cannot) be tried together. The prosecution will…
Good. Fuck these guys. And I don't mean that literally. If you think rapists should be punished with rape you're an idiot.
Always has been. Unless Armenian, Scottish and Dutch white people are no longer white.
No, she is a white woman.
I call bullshit on this story about Kim showing an emotion once.
"But I wanna say that my wife has dated broke black dudes. It got nothing to do with the money."
Please note that Amy Ziering has also been nominated for an Oscar, not just Kirby.
Campus rape is the subject of a new documentary, The Hunting Ground, which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival…
What the fuck does Al Sharpton know?"
McNair is absolutely a first class asshole. Guy is one of the biggest political donors amongst NFL owners. And it all goes to government-drowning, tax-hating, right-wingers. Wouldn't be a problem save for the fact that he is all too happy to take hundreds of millions in public money to pay for his stadium. Fuck that…
I find it all kinds of ironic that my reply was called "stupid" by someone who lacks, by his own admission, the ability to formulate a response.
Readers preferring the story that breaks first in no way necessitates retroactively changing analysis to look right. Not in any way, at all. The writer has the obligation to ensure that they've done their work before publishing, and even then it's completely unwarranted and unjustified to go back and change that,…
Ford: Fix or Repair Daily
Retroactively editing draft boards? Chad? I come to Deadspin to read about sports, not issues arising during the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush!!!
How egotistical do you have to be to do this? Is anyone really going back 5 years later to check out what Chad thought about Spencer Dinwiddie?
This is great reporting. How any of these charlatans can get anyone to listen to them is beyond me. Bill Tobin was right about Mel Kiper and all the rest.