You are aware, I’m sure, that there are team sports, such as “Ice Hockey” or “Football”?
You are aware, I’m sure, that there are team sports, such as “Ice Hockey” or “Football”?
Ooh double-burn! You’re on a roll. :)
Troll much?
Ooh, burn!
“The Allies won WWII, therefore the French did win”
That would’ve been too obvious.
If I had the requisite mad photoshop skillz, I’d now be mashing together a 2CV and a Mini.
Unfortunately, I’m no Harry Turtledove or Robert Harris.
Also, it’s not necessary for the French to be the good guys... Ooooooooh.
No, a coalition of forces from different countries won.
In an alt-universe, where France won WWII, these are being driven at 250kph on a Europe-wide autoroute network.
I thought there was only one manual that Jalops cared about:
Very active in the Ukraine/Crimea conflict (remember the white trucks carrying “aid”? BBC did a good write up back in January http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-…)
I was going to ask if there would be any WWII boffins left for other people to play (Of course there are).
No problem with top line sponsors or sponsorship in general, it’s the pretence of a company specifically supporting the engine. Say a team was running out of cash: if they needed a few new wheels after a couple of crashes, would they be able to use money provided by an “engine sponsor” to buy them. Unless contracts,…
What’s that Skip? Motorbike crash.*
He may still have them.
Cheating: Bicycle but could’ve just as easily done it on a moto. About 12 mph, black ice.
You own two kangaroos?
FYI It’s not sponsorship I object to. It’s faux direct sponsorship.