taxassist
TaxAssist
taxassist

WAIT! So the narrative is “The Panthers defense doesn’t help poor Cam Newton” and not “The Panthers win if Cam Newton doesn’t throw a red zone INT in the end zone in the 2nd quarter?”

No, what is ironic is that you don’t know what a Mecca is, and yet somehow think I’m the dumb one. A Mecca, when not directly referring to Islam, is a city or place that is the center of an activity or cultural hub. Which means, saying NY hasn’t been “a center or even an especially noteworthy hub for rap music in the

Great layup! Go WNBA!

Fuck Kevin Durant is the greatest diss track ever written

There’s a text from the ”victim” to a roommate saying they’re getting a new tv because they “finally filed against Derrick”. I’m guessing Diana hasn’t mentioned it because we’ll read these more if we think he’s guilty.

Still waiting for you to acknowledge the text from the “victim” where she says she’s getting a new tv because she sued.

If Rose was a woman, this headline would be an example of“slut shaming.” But he’s a guy so it’s supposed to imply that he’s scumbag.

i always wondered, do you still need clear verbal consent if you have been sexually involved with someone for 10,15,20 years and have no reason to believe any further relations would be non consensual

at deadspin all accusations are guilty until it’s like Duke and then they just stop talking about it...

This has no bearing on whether he raped someone or not. I figured this was an anti-spurglary tactic, men with (perceived) status and riches would be stereotypical targets for spurglary though that doesn’t make them actual targets. Presumably they tell the rookies to only use condoms they’ve supplied themselves in the

While I certainly agree with your advice, and Mr. Rose could well be a misogynist, I don’t see how you get there from here. He’s talking specifically about why he takes his used condoms with him after having sex with women, at a trial about a particular instance of (allegedly non-consensual) sex with a woman. Just

Buddy, I’m on your side here...this is a misplaced Jezebel article.

How is this relevant? Didn’t you read the article & the promoted comment?

These kinds of facts don’t matter.

“ I get you drunk” makes it a false equivalence. The facts in this case show that the plaintiff was willfully drinking her own alcohol that she had on her property. She also gave them drinks she was in ownership of.

If you had a person come into the shop and talk about cars and never buy one because there was an understanding that they didn’t actually want to buy one from you then it would be much more morally upsetting to sell them a car when they came in drunk.

(b) Exceptions.

Exactly, they’re definitely going to bring up his past. No reason they shouldn’t bring up hers. I’ve been away for a bit since Gawker went down but it’s good to see the writers here are still advocating guilty until proven innocent for the wealthy and famous. /s

How about "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Now why is that so hard to understand.

Militia has been reaffirmed in many cases to refer to both the organized and unorganized (any able bodied-male who can be called up for service) militias. The unorganized militias need to supply their own weaponry which should be equivalent or sufficiently similar to the organized militias.

Ah, so just as thought, you have no idea what you are talking about. Thanks for clearing that up.