This also seems like something the patriarchy would make so they can claim ownership over someone else.
This also seems like something the patriarchy would make so they can claim ownership over someone else.
Waiting for the next update where the robot will destroy boxes and trees indiscriminately --- just to be safe.
I understand what you’re getting at, but end of the day both of those choices are strategic moves made in the interests of the business. From a human point of view it really sucks, from a business point of view buying another company and it’s IP still makes sense.
Well, can’t say he wasn’t trying to do his research at least.
I think it’s totally up to her to track who is or isn’t part of the chain of abuse associated with her husband. If they were part of it I’m sure she would have terminated them already — she had no reason to wait till now.
She could, but the article is basically explaining why she isn’t doing that. She is still treating her staff as human beings that she doesn’t want to just fire, especially when they probably have skillsets that can be repurposed elsewhere for her.
I also assume women that can afford to get pregnant or keep themselves from getting pregnant don’t care.
I miss having an outcome that is punishing for failing your stealth. In Valhalla, failed stealth meant I’d probably just wipe the floor with everyone and get it done faster anyways.
I just glanced at the trailer so now I gotta ask.... did it turn a profit?
Maybe just mandate everyone wear robes then you can wear your $1200 suit or dress under that.
Wow, I’m actually struggling to process how many levels of messed up you’d have to be to text someone “I love raping you”. Just how unapologetic and narcissistic you’d have to be to put that into writing, how wildly above the law you’d have to believe yourself to be. It’s boggles my mind.
Also, asking for a friend.
even if they made $10 trillion dollars it wouldn’t be enough to meet their sales expectations.
The Republican way seems to be more of a self hostage situation than actual governance doesn’t it?
but the quote itself is talking about the presidential and congressional elections.
I dunno, I’m not convinced disfunction is a deal breaker that would cost the support of republican voters.
Maybe the money is actually in some abused worker’s hands and we don’t know about it. That would fulfill the prophecy -- we can hope at least.
This blog is misleading. As much as I hate cutting people’s benefits saying people should have more kids and not wanting to pay for them to have them are actually two different things.
that would not be anyone’s loss.
It’s almost only worth mentioning when an NFT game is NOT a scam.