Pro-life isn’t about saving babies lives, it’s about making sure poor people stay poor and rich people get to keep their opportunity.

Given how easy this landmine is to just not step on, it’s never surprising how many fools go ahead and step on it.

They’re designed for making sure openly racist white people can keep their money and power while making sure the rest have to struggle way harder to get lesser results.

You can’t just investigate openly racist white people, that’s not what laws in the United States of America are designed for.

I’m gonna disagree, not because I don’t think that’s untrue. But let’s go with that and assume that no one has any reluctance to shoot each other whatsoever. The problem is still that anyone wants to shoot anyone else at all. This guy’s reason’s was white supremacy and the perceived notion that a person of color…

The disqualifying part to his eligibility seems to be how honest he is.  

This looked too easy, he should really turn off the lock-on next time.

If the psychologist who did an assessment of her is to be believed and she does indeed have borderline personality disorder.  The weight she puts on how people perceive her would be incredible and this behavior totally checks out.

At least this is a deal they should actually be disappointed in.

I don’t know about the States, but up here in Canada, the context matters. if you’re going 100km/h down the highway and a deer jumps out and you slam on the brakes that’s justification and is legal. If there’s absolutely no reason for you to do that it’s flat out illegal. We learn it in driver training.  Not knowing…

It’s all just a cow with the spots in different places to me.

I don’t know if its the warmness of the light or not, but incandescent bulbs diffused light differently it seems.  LED lights seem to be very intense and then seems to drop off more sharply than incandescent did.  I feel like I’m lighting things up with spotlights with LEDs.

Tony Stark dies at the end of Endgame.

After the first clip, you gotta wonder if this guy was a storm trooper or something.

The first video is on the borderline of triggering my “nails on a chalkboard” response.

I knew that there would be no convincing Nano with real facts and math [and] physics.

Nah man, that’s some next level human pretzel twisting to imagine guilt where there probably isn’t any.

If she was intending to steal it, why lock it in a supply closet for 5 days and never take the money?

well it’s eventually going to have to settle its debate with gravity.

if we’re being totally pedantic, we have to go with MOST crashes, cause I know of at least one incident where an air traffic control mishap resulted in a crash with another plane in the air.