tasteskindasalty
tasteskindasalty
tasteskindasalty

I'm not sure how I've avoided the bad kids club but I go up to people's cars and throw a sticky bomb on it. They get real pissed and chase me around until they wreck and die by their own hands. Sometimes I hit the button...but no women or children...scarface taught me better.

Its people like this that make me wonder if it really is better to play games on PC. How many dumbass kids are on Live and PSN? The ratio has to be like 10 dumbasses to every 1 normal person who wants to actually play the game. Passive mode is fine if you want to make sure they can't kill you, but it doesn't

If you're stuck in a session alone, hit start -> Online -> New Session.

Yeah, thankfully they were playing the Rays, Joe Madden is quite the student of the game, and more than most managers, would understand the gravity of the situation and the fact that one of the Legends of the game (properly capitalized) needed to go out in Legendary fashion.

I think it's more of a tradition thing. Back when games didn't have online multiplayer, you'd have a bunch of friends meet up to play. Since it's a little harder getting everybody together than it is now with online, you'd only do this once every other week or so. This meant needing to stay up all night. So everybody

Every fanbase is terrible, but Saints fans are the worst because they've been a fan of the team for what seems like 5 fucking minutes, but will be the first to tell you that they are lifers. Your stadium has been empty for about 40 years. You're not fooling anybody.

I will approve this message!

Let us also not forget that animals cannot consciously, willingly *SIGN* legally binding marriage contracts.

What the people who object to gay marriage based on a (fictional) 'slippery slope' because anything could be legal if enough people wanted it (and many people who argue with them) DON'T seem to understand (at least it's rarely mentioned) - is that they are fundamentally against a democratically run society. They

One problem (well, many problems, but here's one) is that this is about allowing two consenting adults to get married. Prove to me that a cat, a dog, a horse, etc. can give verbal or written consent and then they (you?) have an argument. Until then, they (you?) just look like fucking nut bars.

It's not about "want to bone/marry". It's about consent. A child can't legally consent to being a partner, a dog/horse/cat/springbok can't consent to being a partner. It's not about what somebody wants, it's about a consenting partner agreeing.

I know, right? I mean did this happen with women's suffrage? Was there a great scare that dogs and horses suddenly could vote because women could? Or that children could vote? Or people could vote multiple times?

Luckily there are enough people who treat their pets like children to make up for the idiots who don't want to marry them.

He could have been more prepared if he hadn't smashed the security cameras...

They have no leg to stand on so they make the most ridiculous jump in terms of their "logic" to try to prove a point. Good thing they end up looking even more crazy after these comparisons come through.