tarheelbandb
The Ja Rule of Kinja
tarheelbandb

Neither really for me. The drug forced my body to reject food both mentally and physically. Mentally by literally making food seem like the last thing on earth I wanted. Physically by making me “I ate too much food, nauseous”
The effect for me was almost always feeling like I had eaten a Christmas meal and eating just

For me the weight has stayed off.
OP is probably correct in that it’s very much like bariatric surgery. I only have others descriptions to go by, but the drug mentally made food unappealing to me such that I only wanted to eat when i was hungry. It eliminated my mid meal snacking and the effects of my workouts were

Yes, but those things are potential side effects an not something everyone experiences. Therefore, in the context of the drugs effectiveness, the results are not defined by these outliers.

No. You are reducing bulimia into it’s physical manifestations rather than addressing the mental cause that also defines bulimia.

I would not be surprised if this is the Day 1 exploit that Cellulite has been using.

You cannot see the subject screws. They are located beneath the black mylar flap. And no they are not Phillips. 

Aren’t “TV Timeouts” built into every team’s clock management game plans?
Or am I misunderstanding and this is basicly a change that stops the ad change over that occurs, instead replacing it with in stream ads?

Spicy out here catching strays.

I dunno. I think DeNiro is pretty ok.

Sounds like a personal problem, bud. *Kanye Shrug*

Also, since I like citations.

“While factually and semantically true....” At least we can agree that to you, the facts are inconsequential to your feelings and desire for catchy, non "boring" headlines. That’s something to celebrate at least. Gotta get you to read by hook or crook, amirite?

Yes. It actually does make more sense, maybe not to some gun hating alarmist that thinks anyone with a gun must be psychotic. That’s the whole point. Carrying a weapon, even in a hospital is a completely mundane affair in some places. One does not need to be a headache for this to occur. Just aloof.  Just like when

A. What argument am I trying to win? That the article itself literally makes a distinction between being in an MRI vs being in the room? And that it would not get the reaction it is getting if it had stated that she was in the room as it does in the actual article?

*yes from a safety perspective, there is no difference.

1. Not in reality 2. Not in the context of the replies, most of which understand that there is a difference. If it were the same thing, there would be no need to distinguish the difference between the two. Having overseen the installation and upgrade of  2 Siemens MRIs in the last 10 months as well as being

Gut Microbe research walked so psuedo-turd references could run.

Pointing this out is the same losing battle as pointing out that the use of CRISPR to make the drought resistant corn for your hogs and soda is no more unnatural than you know, breeding corn for the same effect.

But, people take that shit way too far and think surely if I eat a shit ton of these berries it will have

used to appear? Are you even replying from this website? just scroll down.

This would be hillarious if the author hadn’t used a clickbait headline. She was not in the MRI machine. She was in the room.