At the rate information moves and the willingness of people to disseminate information without verifying I see this as really being for photo journalists as intended. Especially when they may be accused of faking a photo.

I clicked through and read/watched every link in this article and the only one that was remotely instructional reather than a report that some one had or can do a thing was the key fob replay. So sure, you are certainly allowed to feel a way about that and that feeling is valid, but is still miles away from the broad…

In what way does this article suggest you buy ,”hacking devices to use against others that they dislike.” Or even suggest malicious intent?

I'm sure they were thinking to prevent their number from being stolen 

.

But your reply is based on your personal opinion of how that plays out, and not an actual source claiming this to be true. The only way that statement works is if ESA said something to the effect of "it is with reluctance/hesitancy/etc that we select SpaceX." 

Thanks. I'm used to citations directly referencing a claim.

Ah. Thanks. 

Is the basis of the "reluctantly" solely based on ECs beef with Muskitter? If so, this is pretty sloppy and sensationalist. Not to mention a leap to think one would cause feelings for the other. 

Tavarish. Tavarish. Tavarish. 

I thought about that, but determined that to just be shitty business running. Not so much intent to tank. 

To that point, Said is would gladly welcome the opportunity to tech-wash by allowing Twitter to be great again. 

I have for months been trying to find another example of such blatant attempts at running a company into the ground and the best I can come up with is Ewing Conspiracy via the ‘85 NBA Draft. Obviously the Knicks got Pat, but what will Elon’s prize be? A tax write off for the gazillions in profit he makes when he…

“Localization”....I’d bet you can DL it by changing the region on the device you are playing on or by using a VPN that tunnels into Ukraine. But the voices would not be in English, so Pyrrhic victory?

Just to drive home the point that self-titled albums are usually the worst see: Beyonce:Beyonce

LOL. Devs out here really trying not to get clipped by a missile on their next commercial flight.

“Blockbuster films have been shot for less”

So and much too often we expect science to always be about making new discoveries and forget how important validation is. Spending more money just to justify the findings of earlier money spent is great especially if it can give you a greater degree of confidence in the current findings. 

Wait.....I think Musk has a point.
I also don’t have a full understanding of the rights of Asylum “seekers”. They haven’t been granted assylum, so does that mean until they are, they are granted all the rights of residents? What consideration is there for the employerif the asylum isn’t granted? Are they SOL if…

Tim has a point in that the issues with AI are really a natural evolution of the Studios control over IP.