It’s confusing as to whether DeSantis is saying Chinese people or Chinese Corporations. The Corporations part is reasonable, IMO, because the line between Chinese Corporations and THE Government is often indecipherable.

To that point, things like this happen

I think I agree with the sentiment here, but not the xenophobic policy disguised as protecting American Interests. American Interests should have priority, but if literally, and I do mean literally no one is interested in buying the land, then in a very regulated “but you don’t really own it” kind of way, sold to…

Reclaiming my time*

Sucker. I fit a 55 inch TV in my 2004 Toyota Corolla back in 2013.
If only I could find the $80K or so I saved......

At some point (maybe we are past the point) this becomes a massively popular conspiracy theory that results in tangible criminal activity (not speculatively). Pizzagate immediately comes to mind. It’s like this will never get put to rest. Even if Shelly were to begin making public appearances, people would just brush…

The only real difference is the monetization. Articles are published to be read as are the comments.
So, to me, it seems that though you are saying, because someone is getting paid for the content they provided, they are somehow more deserving of the free service of pointing out spelling and grammatical errors than…

re: institution.- I think intent is important. In order for “institution’s” to be correct the phrase would need to be “institution’s terrifying leader”. I was almost certain that the authors intent was to describe the institution as terrifying and not the leader so “terrifying institution leader”, I believe, is…

LOL.

Article literally says he plead not guilty.
Your cognitive dissonance with what I know you clearly read correctly is a whole ‘nother argument about how “innocent until proven guilty” is a load of shit and how being charged with something immediately presumes guilt.

When I read that, “anti-zealots”, I instantly recognized it as a good phrase.
It adequately describes Remi, without being derogatory. It’s probably even a good middle ground word to describe people that are not necessarily religious but can understand and respect anyone’s decision to practice any particular religion…

Never forget

Way to get ahead of the “Biden Bailout” comments.

HEY HEY! Winner Winner, Chicken Dinner!
A new fighter has entered!
Oh Wait....$80K....sad face.

Yeah, the narrative you are spinning doesn’t ring true. They went the IVF route because of fertility issues. IVF represented hope for many families, and while this family is probably the most famous, they are certainly not the only ones that experienced multiple births while shooting for one.

“If you can’t feed your baby, yeah yeah, then don’t have a baby” -Michael Jackson

Aptera and Elio are not the same company, and as the Elio didn’t see production, obviously not.

No the Aptera that is as much in production as Lightyear.

Sorry.....Is the Aptera not the first solar powered production car?

This is a good list pointing out dubious situations presented in the show. And again, I stated that many of the decisions are ethically contradictory to Federation (I meant Starfleet) standards. But I would not consider the first 2 morally grey. The last 2 are both at the worst end of the moral & ethic spectrum, IMO
But…

Best Trek. Absolutely.
Morally Grey; Not by my definition but worth a discussion. I think DS9 does an excellent job of showing what it’s like “in real life” in space. While a lot of the decisions go against the Federations ethics, the decisions that are made tend to be equitable in nature. I have a hard time…