it literally says “upon accessing Tump’s financial disclosures for 2018/2019, there is no current investment in Thermo Fisher Scientific.”
Am I missing the punchline?
it literally says “upon accessing Tump’s financial disclosures for 2018/2019, there is no current investment in Thermo Fisher Scientific.”
Am I missing the punchline?
Out of curiosity. You realize you linked a tweet that says Trump does not own stock in TF, thereby negating the claim that he is profiting from the virus outbreak, right?
If I could take a stab at it I think there are 2 maybe 3 hingst at play.
“The Tesla, however, is somehow fooled, and read this sign as an 85 MPH sign.”
correct.
As a point of order (as Iam not sure how serious your comment is actually) 1/130 represents .008% failure.
Between 2014 and 2018 Tesla had 14 fires (agnostic of random combustion or an accident, fire is fire) and sold over 300,000 Model S. That’s 0.00005%. So factually false statement.
My comment about QC was about…
Hey Hyooo!
I was expecting an article within the context of recent allegations of her homo/transphobia. https://www.theroot.com/transgender-employee-of-rosario-dawson-hits-actress-wit-1839273881
This with a pop culture news cycle that includes discussions about people “coming out” to provide cover for criticism, like the…
can’t wait for the Tesla vs Porsche PR spin comparisons. I am not joking. How porsche handles this fire and if it comes to, future fires, will be one of the major factors in public opinion about the safety of the 2 brands. I think Porsche already won the build quality and QC war....or a least “winning”
This guy gets it. The other guy thinks theres a very real chance you could be forced to choose between the Tesla and the Porsche to deliver those ....wait...This is just a Digiorno in a paper bag with the word “Pizza” written on crayon at the top.
No one is giving Tesla a pass. And perhaps you do not have a bad attitude, but you are taking for granted that you are clearly communicating your point. You keep making piecemeal statements and then replying with a full explaination of what you are trying to say and deliberately taking my comments out of context. .…
must be some of that reverse sponsored ad psychology.
I’m not sure which part is wrong, but it is clearly apparent you didn’t read the original reply if you think I think it is wrong to criticize Tesla. Doubly so since I have already said that the issue with the Tesla is heat realted. So, nice job being top notch kinja.
Additionally if anyone is moving goal posts its…
In a test that does not replicate anything other than someone on a drag strip would experience.
But Ok.
And
Just to be clear....you are saying that 0-60 in under 6 seconds is not good? Compared to what?
“I would be pissed to go from 100k Tesla numbers to Prius numbers just because I am on the 5th on ramp of the day.”
1. Yes, anyone would be pissed at that. The Prius does o-60 in like 9.5 seconds. But you drive an 85D so you already know that you don’t get anywhere nears Prius numbers (see pt 2.) Full disclosure, I…
Only so much as “ poor bead fit and sub-optimal handling” are insufficient for the bike with car tires. I didn’t watch the video, but the article doesn’t seem to address the fact that u shaped tires offer more surface contact in a turn than the car tire.
If you packed the bag and controlled the bag the entire trip, that’s a different story. The cost isn’t really the issue tho. Once your GE or TSA-PReis revoked, it’s nigh impossible to get cleared again and your CC isn’t gonna pay for it again for another 5 years.
LOL. Fuck that. Hell if I’m gonna put my Precheck and potentially Global Entry at risk.
Me: Surely Torch is on to something here
Me 45 seconds and a video later: What the hell is wrong with Torch today?
Sure I guess, but Mahindra was it’s own identity. The same way FCA is it’s own identity. I’m willing to bet that most of the readers here had never head of Roxor prior to this. That doesn’t mean that just because you weren’t the primary audience that Roxor somehow is ape-ine FCA’s identity.