Could someone please explain to me exactly what the FBI should have done about Cruz? He bought his gun legally. Until the shooting, he broke no laws. (Everyone’s a law-abiding citizen until they break the law.) So is there anything the FBI could have done that YOU wouldn’t have protested as “just another example of…

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

Uh huh. And who approves the app?

Respectfully, this has nothing to do with the First Amendment. Government is not allowed to censor ideas. Your fellow citizens can use every legal means to stifle ideas they don’t like all day long.

Quiet, racist. The adults are talking. We’ll deal with you “conservatives” when we’ve dealt with the GOP politicians. Go back to fucking your sister.

The First Amendment does not apply at all here. The First Amendment only applies to action by the government.

None of those things are examples of censorship. Censorship is the surpression of *information* by an *authority*. Complaining about objectionable content is a free market practice. Asking for content to be removed is not equivalent to banning the content itself, which, again, would require some level of authority.

Oh no, my liberalness has just been dealt a critical blow!

How is this unconstitutional, or even censorship?

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

1st amendment, bitches!!1!

Needs more cucks. 

Yeah it is. 

They may not have any control over the content of the channels, but Apple, Google, Roku, etc, still have complete control over which channels they allow on their respective services.

What does this have to do with censorship or the constitution. Do you really believe there is a constitutional right for AmazonTV to carry the NRA channel?