The employees don't benefit when they do FAR more work than he does.
The employees don't benefit when they do FAR more work than he does.
Hoo boy, you lack some serious self awareness.
Because brand loyalty
You respond to only half my comment and accuse me of not reading 🤣.
No, I concluded that, since there are conflicting anecdotes, that the issues presented are isolated and not systemic.
Zero plus stock, sure. Not free and certainly more than store employees. And he still profits off their work
🤦♂️his firm owns 12% of GS and he still makes money off of that. He's not working for free.
Ah yes, the highly valued “that alternative company also sucks” marketing scheme. Classic.
No one said anything close to that numbskull.
Yeah, no dude. Some may not be able to because of bad DLs, SLs, or state laws but they most certainly can close in most locations if they need their break.
Yeah, I’m not defending GS at all, but trying to point out that’s its a little weird to act like it’s somehow better to shop at an evil, behemoth company to spite an incompetent, crumbling company.
Really kind of a potato potato issue. Doesn't really make a difference to the point being made.
They completely buy the illusion that more money=harder worker.
That’s an isolated shit show. Amazon is company wide.
Yeah, that's an individual and not systemic issue then. Because I've known people in a similar situation in GS and worked in a mall location myself and didn't have that issue. Your shitty DM isn't the entire company like Amazon's issues are.
Then they get X times nothing.
I have very large hands and it really doesn’t matter where the sticks are located. It’s marketing and blind brand loyalty.
Never heard of GS employees pissing in water bottles because they can't take breaks.
“Fortunately for productive, Better examples of the species, vermin like you have no authority whatsoever to dictate anyone’s wages.
CEOs should cap at X times their lowest paid employee salary. They only go up if everyone does.