This.

Just because it's the first time you've heard about him doesn't mean that he doesn't have a very well-known history of acting like this. Jesus Christ, logic 101.

By saying "She is trying way too hard," it's clear what you're arguing for.

Despite NUMEROUS pieces evidence to the contrary that he has acted in a similiar fashion time and time again.

People like you are part of the problem.

She chose to enter the beauty pageant. She didn't choose to have a serious talk on STEM careers be derailed.

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

That link is gold. Will be resharing/10. Thank you!

Saw this kind of entitled, selfish behaviour all the time through college (UK college, not US college) and even university. Glad he's been called up on it, hopefully he'll learn.

Already responded to your original quote in my first post. You then went on to say:

"I just take issue with the implication that advice should be ignored because it might constitute 'splaining. There's a baby and bathwater problem with that direction."

I was obviously continuing the conversation.

It's not about her "ignoring advice," it's about people who are probably no more knowledgeable about it than she is (even if they don't know she's a PT, they are clearly all just probably regular gymgoers) thinking they have the right to criticise what she's doing and her figure in the first place.

And this does have…

Just because it may be "a bit of a revelation" to her doesn't mean that she deserves it any more, or that it's even the slightest bit more OK.

You don't know how this works, right? That much is brutally obvious.

No, they don't *just* write articles based on what gets them more clicks. For example, if a blog ran a fairly controversial article (or an article containing a fairly controversial person, as here) and it got a lot of clicks but people were…

Just to clarify, I know you didn't see it like that, but "exotic" women (as us POC are all too often referred to as) are already stereotyped enough as "not being good wife material" or hyper-sexual fetishized "mistresses" without that sort of analogy...

Macs > PCs, any day!

*troll face*

Yes, he was totally doing "the right thing," and not being selfish and immature or trying to detract attention away from the *real* point of her speech - STEM - at all. Could this comment be any more ridiculous?

Hi, I'm a sad little virgin who makes multiple accounts on Jezebel because I can never get laid, and I'm going to comment on every single thread on here trying to put an attractive, accomplished woman way out of my league down.

PLEASE GIVE ME ATTENTION 11111

Third account after sostanky and that Mohammed guy? *soobvious*

You clearly have issues, and not just with her, seeing as how you're falling all over yourself to write every insult out of your ass you can think of on pretty much every single thread on this article.

She has a good degree. You're a middle school science teacher, hardly much "more accomplished" than her. Pack it in. Your feeling threatened by her attractiveness could not be more obvious. *yawn*

In the (extremely unlikely) case he's telling the truth, I knew the education system over the pond could get pretty bad at times, but not THAT bad.

Bullshit.

Sostanky's been trolling all over the site today and for the last few days. And also clearly has at least one other multiple account.

For all the MRAs/boys with precious little relationship experience on here, cut that mansplaining shit out yo. Insisting "wimmen are this 111" does not make it any truer in the voices of…