...and then won the game 7-5.

Frankly, that sounds like bullshit. What's your cousin's name? Who'd he play for?

This is a thought that came to mind on reading the comparison to Stoke City - who have a reputation for an "agricultural" style of play. Which is to say, their players are all a bunch of grotesque orcs who make up for their lack of ability by breaking legs. Accordingly, they concede more legitimate fouls and…

Seems about right to me.

A little while ago, I got into a dispute with someone who claimed that users on Jalopnik should make sure their posts use small words and simple languages because - and I'm paraphrasing here - Jalopnik users are morons.

The BBC highlights were due to start in... two minutes. Which was about 90 seconds before I saw this article tagged on to the underside of another article on Jezebel.

What if you were on another Gawker site and happened to notice the link to this article at the bottom of the page?

No.

Interesting. The one I sent him just read:

If you understood that this article was a joke (and what the joke was), then why is your "critique" wholly concerned with an explanation of what oxytocin is and does - when such considerations are almost entirely irrelevant to the purpose of the piece?

If publishers are willing to put those books out there in a shameless attempt to cash in on the success of similar franchises (often using thinly veiled pastiches of the source franchise's covers, no less), then more power to the authors.

I am uninitiated and it seemed to me like a cross between Buffy and Brain AIDS.

Will someone have any thought for the brother and other relatives?

"I want to hold you close and look deep into your eyes as you enter me."

Pedantry corner: Not to nit pick, but it is nits that are picked.

She died a citizen!

Sure they did.

Still too soon. :(

Is there a word for that?