Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    talbett
    Tal
    talbett

    It isn’t legal in the NFL at least.  The rule requires a 5 yard penalty for “improper fair catch signal”.  He clearly made a deceptive motion with his arms/shoulders to simulate a fair catch signal.

    Clearly 13 year old boys are getting married too young.

    Taking a bunch of money from Amazon would not have addressed the housing shortage in Seattle.  Solving that problem is only possible if the citizens of Seattle decide to let people build and renovate without incredibly burdensome restrictions.

    Wahhh!  My free meal wasn’t up to my standards.  Don’t you know who I am?  No, ok I guess no one really does. 

    Over 150 yards from scrimmage in first game.  Maybe not such a bad signing after all.

    Anyone that might care for the complete story, can try this pretty thorough Twitter thread - the guy is not a Trump shill, just someone who understands the context of this claim.

    Serena has a huge sponsorship that pays her MILLIONS based completely on her “bad girl” (err, Mother) image.

    Because people never used such terms for McEnroe...oh wait, yes they did. All the freaking time.

    It was because she’s black.

    Step One: Publish anonymous op-ed in the New York Times.

    I’ll be starting a new GoFundMe campaign to make up all the lost money.  You can trust me.  :)

    Wireless...ie, the stuff that was not actually part of the repeal of net neutrality.

    Other than the obvious expense of the custom bags, this is a great idea.

    :Looks around for the article about Farrakhan being front row:

    Wouldn’t he have known that BEFORE he applied for the astronaut program? 

    Or the NRA.

    Well “it’s only preseason” but AP just ran for 57 yards on 11 carries, in a bit over a quarter of work.

    People want to ban straws and balloons as much for the purported plastic waste as for the use of helium. People just want to ban shit to make themselves feel like they are “making a difference”.

    Because thinking we might run out of something in 117 years, assuming both (1) no new supplies are found (when the largest supply in history was found 2 years ago) and (2) that our current rate of usage doesn’t change (even though prices will surely rise as the US stockpile selloff ends) is the very definition of