And one wonders why people decided Trump’s vulgarity isn’t disqualifying. Politics follows culture, and Trump is definitely more of a symptom of a culture that Deadspin and its denizens have been cultivating for a while.
And one wonders why people decided Trump’s vulgarity isn’t disqualifying. Politics follows culture, and Trump is definitely more of a symptom of a culture that Deadspin and its denizens have been cultivating for a while.
Err...is that honestly what people think when you call someone a “Son of a bitch”? That the insult is really against the person’s mother...
You can never have too many of Dr. Andrew’s patients.
So no go on a black quarterback, who happens to be patriotic? I mean RG3 of course.
Government bans on usury don’t apply to the government.
Depending on how the return played out, Elliott certainly could have made a tackle. DB’s often run all over the place during a return - partly because it is by definition a broken play with no clear run lanes and partly because all defense players are looking for the Pick-6.
I bought one back on May 5th (at least that’s what Amazon’s page tells me). I returned it. It would only work about 1/2 the time. Buy at your own risk.
I bought one back on May 5th (at least that’s what Amazon’s page tells me). I returned it. It would only work…
If average is preferring sports coverage without the wokeness, count me in.
ESPN’s future clearly lies in impressing Gawker by insulting the average sports fan. Good job ESPN!
I think you underestimate (significantly) how much church income goes to tax-exempt activities. But regardless, under your approach, churches would simply spin off tax exempt entities to employ their workers and spend their “income”. The oversight required by the IRS would be extreme (and extremely intrusive). Thus…
At which point the $80 billion figure isn’t meaningful. Why not simply continue to treat them the same as other non-profit entities?
If only we could go back in time to when before Trump was President. There was no racist violence then.
“Should pay” assumes we “should” consider donations made to them as income, while not allowing them to deduct the significant expenses made in support of social services. It seems you would allow non-religious organizations to continue to avoid taxes, even though they perform the same work. Short of deleting “the…
Given that Christian relief groups are providing the vast majority of relief funds, perhaps Gawker and it’s commenters should take a step back a reconsider their bigoted animus. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/10/hurricane-irma-faith-groups-provide-bulk-disaster-recovery-coordination-fema/65100700…
Great illustration of why it’s a pointless concept.
What is it when you view every interaction through an often distorting lens of social justice politics? Workplaces often include superiors telling subordinates what to do, how to do it and why. Suck it up.
So no money to any non-profit entity? Interesting view. Would certainly help lower federal spending.
“Going around” in this case means not invading Switzerland.
But LAST year, when we were seeing a “drought” of Atlantic Hurricanes, it had nothing to do with Global Warming/Climate Change.
Wait until she graduates college. She’ll go back to being straight then. :)