Well he was closely ties to the Motion Picture Alliance, a well known strongly anti-Semitic organization.

The DCCC’s new rule to protect sitting Democrats won’t just make it hard for women and minorities to challenge incumbents; it will also make it harder for women and minorities to obtain and keep consulting jobs.

Random, but they did split the draws into 2 groups:  Those above 2% and those below 2% in polling.  Then they drew randomly from those 2 groups to assemble the 2 nights.  It was like New Orleans winning the NBA lottery again, unfair, but nevertheless random.  

all I want to do is see Elizabeth Warren crush Bernie Sanders

Audi. Bayer. Siemens. Thyssenkrupp. BMW. Deutsche Bank. You’d be hard pressed to find a German company founded before WW2 that DIDN’T have some relationship/ties to the Nazis.

What Happens When You Elect Conservatives, part Infinity

Companies pulling out of Georgia does accomplish one thing: it protects employees who might otherwise have to move to Georgia either temporarily or permanently for jobs at those companies. It also might give some employees currently working for that company in Georgia a chance to relocate. I don’t know if that…

I support the boycott. I know that it will harm good people, but boycotts do that. We need to make a stand; even if it hurts. What’s the alternative? Let them coast along with no real consequences?

Boycotts work. The HB boycott might not have worked but only because businesses didn’t stay away long enough and accepted the compromise bill. As long as studios stay away and filming in Georgia virtually disappears, for long enough that the State feels the impact, it will work. Or, at the very least, Republicans will…

I remember hearing the same arguments about divestiture in South Africa: stay and help end apartheid vs. get the fuck out.
I don’t need to tell you which method worked.

The insistence I’ve seen among prosecutors that in the face of clearly exculpatory evidence that their decisions were still correct is disturbing to the point of being pathological. She’s by no means the only one.

She wrote an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal

She may have wanted justice for the rape survivor, but her methods guaranteed that there would be no justice. She was under pressure to make arrests, file charges, and get guilty verdicts as soon as possible, and she succeeded. Getting the right person was secondary.

This. She’s embarrassed by the attention that this has brought up and she’s reacting....quite badly. Look, at the time, she thought she was right and wanted justice for the woman and got blinded by that. I think people would kind of get that...not agree with it, but get it. What people won’t get or understand is how…

What strikes me the most about the story of the Central Park Five is its aftermath: More than one of the 5 used the money they were awarded to engage in advocacy and start foundations to help those who are in the same position they were. Meanwhile, the cops who were actually in the wrong have learned nothing, and…

Just when I thought it was as bad as it got. Half a dozen women attacked, half a dozen children jailed, and this woman is crying because her reputation is in tatters? Tell us what’s really important Linda. 

She’s had 30 years to get her story and lies straight but instead she decides to go with full on righteous indignation over being called out for her prosecutorial misconduct. She now says she agrees that the rape convictions should have been overturned but early said that Reyes was the sixth attacker and stayed after…

Despite any legitimate good work she has done on behalf of women and those impacted by violence

It should also be noted, that by railroading these five young men into confessing to a crime they didn’t commit, the real attacker, Matais Reyes (who had attacked a woman in similar fashion two nights before the Central Park Jogger, an attack where they were able to NAME him as a suspect because of stitches on his chin…

An outright fabrication? One that paints her in a bad light?