Bodil Joensen, Denmark's infamous "Boar Girl" was a farmer who also (go figure) was known to be the area's best in animal husbandry. She loved animals. Really loved animals. And did so on camera.

The current law that allows bestiality specifically makes a point to outlaw animal cruelty. Which is enough.

That you don't find it funny is not a problem. Its a dumb, corny joke.

"Hmm... not as filling as I thought."

There's a restaurant chain called Mary Brown's that's really popular in Newfoundland (it's their version of KFC...only 10x better and more edible, plus poutine taters). Their slogan used to be: The best legs in town. Open all night long.

I'm going to reserve judgement until we find out how annoying these people were.

Oooh a twist! I like! ;)

Agreed. When I see her name listed in credits for a movie I know that I absolutely don't need to see it

It's cute how you even entertain the notion that Melissa McCarthy will not be in this movie.

He's giving his voters (and the photographer) the British equivalent of a middle finger in this picture. "Here's what I think about your wages and rights, peasants."

Just understand that you can't come here and have a logical conversation unless you plan on sharing the same view as everyone else.

the point is that he will not come face to face with her... I'd be fine with her seeing me in my most fragile state because she doesn't know me and it won't affect me. I know she has to live knowing everyone's seen her naked now, but it makes much less of a difference seeing someone's private photos if you don't…

I agree and after I perused some of them with my fiancé after the first leak, she texted me asking where she could find the next viral leak, and I had no idea.

I can't speak for Detroit 68, but I know that's not what happened because of my basic knowledge of the law and reading comprehension skills.

This.

There's something that needs to be clarified here. This case is not about whether it is or is not illegal to photograph parts of women's bodies which are exposed to the public. This case is about whether the police, who observed this man taking pictures of women in public, had a right to stop him and search the…

Sounds like the law is written to criminalize manipulating a camera angle to take pictures of body parts intended to be concealed by clothes ("there is no evidence that the Defendant positioned his camera on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial or otherwise underneath individuals' clothing in order to capture clothed or…

This is a female judge that took the time to condemn the photographer's legal actions as "repellent and disturbing." While the law needs changing, I don't think anyone should be advocating for judges that deliberately misinterpret a law to suit their personal beliefs.

yeah everyone's pissed at the judge for not pretending that the law covered stuff it didnt. What do you want? Judges to start making shit up when they read something and say "hmm, I think this should probably be illegal too. don't worry democracy, Judge Knowitall has got this covered"