Fuck off, you presumptuous, narcissistic piece of shit. There are other people in the world and some of them like things you don't.

Holy shit, what is it with animal cunts and wanting the rest of the world to bend over backward to accommodate their batshit beliefs? I like ivory and fur but I don't expect anyone who doesn't to have to modify their lifestyles to fit mine.

The Bechdel test is an irrelevant waste of discussion and if you think there's a problem if a movie has "too few" women you are sexist.

Fuck off. The current system is you pay for higher difficulty levels, or are given them by performing to a high standard. You can't just buy a degree from Harvard, you pay for the privilege of earning it just as at any other college, except this one has more stringent standards making it harder to attain and is…

You really are a stupid cunt. Who the fuck said anything about Objectivism being right or wrong? What I said was that if people are paying for government trash pickup they might as well use it, but arguing against governments using taxes for trash pickup simultaneously does not make them hypocrites.

There's no sense paying separately for garbage pickup and being taxed for it. You can argue for change while working within the strictures of the status quo, you know.

You are incapable of debate. Don't aggrandize yourself. You are so far beneath me the idea that you could understand what I'm talking about, let alone debate it, is as absurd as the idea that I could stab your fucking womb from half a planet away. Much as we might both wish it could be done, we have to accept our…

Again, get the fuck over yourself, you subhuman filth. Do you have any idea how fucking offensive it is for some stupid, hysterical cunt like you, not even a real person, let alone one of value or substance, to think you have a right to assume you know what's going through the head of a writer. It's offensively…

No, in this case, "perceiving nuance" is suffering hallucinations. There's no nuance here. Writers write about people and people notice body parts.

Once again, you're a stupid, subhuman intelligence cunt. See, an ad hominem is when you insult someone instead of proving you wrong. I've proven you wrong to death, and now I'm putting you in your place. Fucking kill yourself, you animalistic scum.

Get over yourself, you presumptuous twat. I'm no more invested in this than you are, you're replying just as often as I am, you stupid cow. Or can't you count, in addition to being unable to distinguish between clinical and sexualised discussion?

You have no right to think it's a matter of nuance. You are some random, paranoid twat on the internet. Assuming that King mentioning breasts is ever sexualised is sexist, heterophobic bullshit. If you think it's "forced" you are either sexist or stupid. I'm thinking both, to be honest.

People notice these things. They are big, heavy sacks of fat on your chest. They're pretty sensitive, too. You notice them.

Then why did you have to make an argument about it? It's not a "running commentary" in the heads of these writer's characters, either, it's something they notice occasionally, much like men notice things like their balls sticking to their thighs. It is a physical thing and the fact that King bothers to tell us how his…

You might genuinely believe you're large breasted, but if you don't find that you notice having big heavy things stuck on your chest very often you probably believe wrong. They have mass, you simply physically can't have large breasts and not be forcibly reminded they exist pretty damn regularly.

Realist exists as I have described it to you.

If it feels fetishizing then you're reading wrong. Seriously, the man is simply stating a thing that happens regularly in real life to provide detail. I have sensitive breasts and when I wear silk I am very aware that I am wearing silk and it is touching my breasts. It is no more fetishizing to write about a woman in…

I actually like vampire subcultures because they make sense. Of course, predatory territorial asocial vampires also make sense, but I read Darren Shan at a young age and I remember thinking "shit, why don't other vampires get together like these ones?". I think the Saga of Darren Shan is something that does almost all…

If it helps, back in the day women really did wear several layers of skirts, for warmth and and modesty.

He talks about men parts just as often as breasts. My boyfriend read It recently, and he's not a reader, he hadn't read a fiction book in years. He was shocked by how often men and lady parts are just mentioned like it's nothing, compared to how cinema and TV treats them, and at one point during It he said something…