Rednecks, white trash, Crackers, sandlappers, but you're talking coastal North Carolina here. Hillbillies are far to the west, hills are far to the west.

Almost as high??? The current Silverado sits lower than any other full size 4x4 truck, so that really isn't saying much.

Finally something positive about Hillary! Tacos!

A good guy with a Jeep!

Wait a minute, what about all that enlightened Northeastern liberal talk? You're telling me there a racists that don't live in Mississippi or Alabama?

"Hopefully with few critters around to dart in front of me." So the potential to kill an animal, or possibly yourself and or another driver while avoiding an animal is a plus?

Exactly!

Well I'm not up to your level of idiocy yet but I'll keep trying. You ever find an answer to my question?

Let me know when you've found your slide rule professor, I'm waiting on the amount of that Hefty offer. And again, I never said the lawsuit had merit, only that Cinemark knew it would crumble, thus their lowball offer. You should learn to read or comprehend what you read.

First, correct my math. What I read was the three worst cases would take $30K each for a $90K total. The remaining 38 would evenly split the $60K remainder (about $1500+ each). So $90K + $60K = $150K.

$150,000 split 41 ways isn't really a "Hefty Generous Settlement Offer" when coming from a $2 billion dollar company. if they wanted this suit to go away, or felt like they were going to lose they would have ponied up way more than that. Heck they spent $500,000 on expert witnesses.

Cancelled huh? I thought Hillary usually had her detractors killed.

I'd wager there was no insurance. You'd be shocked, or maybe you wouldn't at the number of uninsured drivers out there.

Yeah right, the Arkansas River made a cut at cat island and moved two miles over the course of a week. Topos are great tools 99% of the time, but along major rivers or other bodies of water that are prone to accretion/avulsion they become quickly outdated.

The basic stance Clinton supporters have adopted is something like: “We’ve nominated a candidate who is completely untrustworthy, disturbingly evasive, and completely offensive to larges sections of the population. She has done nothing to build a coalition. "IF WE LOSE IT’S BECAUSE OF FRAUD”.

Not to wave a Trump Banner, or confederate flag, but the Left is no bastion of tolerance either. Both sides seem pretty quick to attack anyone or thing that doesn't toe the party line. Everyone is so perpetually offended at anything that doesn't ascribe to the current "Groupthink" mentality.

So what does people imply? I agree that the insertion of a well placed “most” would have been appropriate.

Yeah I got that, just pointing out the fallacy of your statement which you have now contradicted.

“I support the use of the ridgeline as a truck, or crossover truck at the very least...which is all people need anyway.”

So the murderer of 9 people now wants us all to know that killing is wrong. Wish he had figured that out a little sooner.