Why don’t you mansplain to me exactly how a joke about a fictional occurrence to a fictional character is the same as a “joke” about a person’s actual sex life of which the speaker knows nothing?
SXBK22
sxbk22
Why is she a bitch? Why is she an idiot? Because she does not want to have sex with Jonah Hill? Because she said so on French TV? Because his feelings matter more than her feelings? You can have all the seats.
Polite and respectful means not telling you that you are wrong to ascribe to me opinions that I do not hold, points I did not make? Maybe polite and respectful means not doing these things in the first instance.
Or could the joke actually be that no one would fall in love with anyone under those circumstances - i.e., seeing them sodomized by a 3-meter tall demon?
Then he should not have joked that she was a whore.
So maybe people who live in glass houses should not throw stones?
He did provoke her.
Why are you leaving out that he was sodomized by a CGI demon in a comedy film for the LOLs? You are acting as if he was raped by a human in a movie, and she poked fun at that experience.
THIS!!!!
She made a joke about something that happened to him in a movie - something that was placed in the movie to be *funny* - and he takes that same joke and applies it to her as an actual person in real life. Yet, we should feel sorry for him when she delivers a mean reply? No.
Misandry = reverse racism for men.
“Boy, the first time I decided I was into you was when I saw you get fucked in the ass *by a CGI demon* in that one movie.”
Maybe it is his face + body + personality?
Maybe she just thinks Jonah is all around less attractive than Brad Pitt and Leo DiCaprio? He’s certainly nowhere near as “cool” as these two.
If Jonah had been a good sport about the first joke (laughed it off and moved on), perhaps Ornella would not have been so cruel in her reply.
Maybe it is about his face????
You are arguing points that I did not make, and none of what you are saying actually makes any sense. You seem to think political parties exist in a vacuum and that the state of the nation was created in a mere 8 years. You also seem to misunderstand the point I was making re: the Supreme Court (strict vs. broad…
You know that two things can exist at the same time, right? My criticism of your comment did not state or imply that I was giving a free pass to anyone. I was simply - and correctly - pointing out that you are not holding individual voters accountable.
Where is the accountability on the part of the individual voters? The nation is not fine; in case you had not noticed, it is filled with bigots.