sweetlittlebuttercup
Sweet Little Buttercup
sweetlittlebuttercup

Are you over 8? Because unless you are under 8 years old you have no business wearing a romper. Rompers were designed for toddlers. The reason they are so full in the butt is to leave room for a diaper. Once you have graduated 3rd grade you look ridiculous in a romper.

This is not mainstream Catholic, like a school run by the diocese. And certainly not academically rigorous like a Jesuit or Marist brothers schools. This is part of a far right Catholic fringe (think Santorum, not Pope Francis).

No but Catholics care. And there are a lot of Catholics in swing states like PA and MI.

Yeah, that’s the point I was trying to make. If he “destroys” this law he may find himself on the wrong side of clergy pulpit political speech.

I don’t know how to tag. Do I just type “spoiler alert” in all caps?

So, yeah, I agree that this is an awful, and absolutely unconstitutional idea. Church and state and all that.

I read the book because I heard it was so good. I’m hopeful Viola Davis can do more with the character of Ruth than was on the page. She was completely two-dimensional: the nearly flawless strong black woman with apparently no inner life, no sexual appetite (her husband has been dead for years but she has no

That explains it. Something about the baby picture had an uncanny valley feel for me.

I bet Meryl never wears pink.

I hate pink. It’s a color that when pastel is insipid and when bright is garish. Why do people insist on associating pink with feminine?

Wow, you really are having a hard time letting go of this.

Naw, see the photo? The boy was white.

Thank you. I just learned the word “colubrine.” I intend to use it in a sentence tomorrow. Maybe to describe the latest addition to the cabinet.

Thinking that celebrities have thoughtful opinions and that anyone should care what they say is how we ended up with a reality TV character as a President elect. Nick Cannon is apparently as well informed as Donald Trump. At least he has no real power and can be safely ignored.

There is no evidence Barron is a Republican. Give the kid a break. He could turn it to be a perfectly well functioning human being.

I don’t think anyone is making fun of Barron. I can only imagine having sympathy for the poor kid. Regardless of if he is on the spectrum or not, it has to be miserable to have the tangerine Caligula as a father.

This is why he is an anti-vaxxer. He genuinely believes in racial superiority in general and the superiority of Trump genes in particular. He cannot accept that he may be genetically responsible for his child having some kind of disability so it must be the vaccines.

It would have been for William. They would have cared that she was or wasn’t “Queen” material. But Harry is fifth in line and will move down if William has any more spawn. Harry can pretty much marry whomever he wants so long as it’s not a Kardashian. Or a Trump.

He is old enough to have been around for Ross Perot and George Wallace, who both did better than that. Perot got 19% of the popular vote, Wallace got almost 14% and got 46 electoral college votes.

Melania did not choose that particular detail to challenge. Trump’s lawyers did. They chose it because it is the only detail that Melania, not Donald, could refute and they intended to argue that, if this detail isn’t accurate, the rest of the story falls apart as well. (Melania is a lot more sympathetic than Donald