sweetjayne
MissContrarian
sweetjayne

eww, who plays as an Imperial, anyways?

No, you can defame a group, if the group is well-enough defined and discreet.

Absent something like the First Amendment, yes. Let us hear a big round of applause for the Founders and their forethought about the importance of protections on freedom of speech.

Yes, that was the effect of Plessy. What makes no sense is why someone of that viewpoint would think that things were better before that decision. Plessy didn't change anything — it codified the practices of segregation that were already occurring.

Was it hard to fit that much stupid into one paragraph? Inquiring non-southern minds would like to know.

We all know what Hyperbole is, right guys? Maybe we've even used it before ourselves? Ok, good. Now that we are all on the same page, let us untwist our collective panties and take a deep breath.

While on a legal interview, the first would get her thrown out of the office before even speaking with anyone.

Meh, I don't see why they issued an apology. There s nothing wrong with what they said: they spoke truth. It is the truth you dislike. And if years of watching movies about royalty have taught me anything: it is in poor form to take your displeasure out on the messenger.

You teach? And you don't know what this clip is of? Dear Lord, please tell me that you don't teach 1) social studies, 2) history, or 3) current events.

past models have usually had a blond/blue-eyed Brigitte Bardot look.

Whaa? You know you can stream that shit, at anytime, right? Gone are the days of needing to be at a particular place at a particular time to watch a given show.

Beat me to it. ;) My fiance was in the Ary when those little monstrosities came online. They were awful. And universally hated by the soldiers. Thank God they did away with them.

They note that Ruseva has been arrested on suspicion of selling children twice before.

Didn't she date Alexander Skarsgard for awhile? I don't know if that makes her interesting, but it makes me a little bit jealous.

Except, here it is the subject matter of the inquiry. She was taken because she was blonde — thus it is a key relevant fact for a headline that she is blonde.

I'm totally confused — why did they say, according to yesterday's Jez article, that the child wasn't their child, but was "given" to them? Did they not actually say that? Were they just trying to make the police go away in the way they thought quickest?

Of course, "Mexican" is also one hell of a misnomer, racially speaking. Mexican is a nationality, not a race — just like 'American.'

I would agree that asking little girls to prove their racial background is ridiculous... as long as you agree with me that having a special pageant for "Latina" girls is equally ridiculous, and, in fact, the whole reason that such a background check was deemed 'necessary' in the first place. If we want to have

Omg. I want the little flat eared one. Such a little derp.